B Gravitational Waves: Mass Interaction Questions Answered

NotASmurf
Messages
150
Reaction score
2
Hey all. Since gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, when they are "escaping" from mass, doe's their intensity lower? If so what mass would be needed to completely absorb a gravitational wave given the wave's properties? Any help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NotASmurf said:
Since gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, when they are "escaping" from mass, doe's their intensity lower?

In other words, do they behave like light waves and "redshift" as they climb out of a gravity well? I believe the answer is yes, but I have not seen any detailed treatments of this.

NotASmurf said:
what mass would be needed to completely absorb a gravitational wave

A wave can't really be "completely absorbed". Consider the analogy with electromagnetism: an object absorbs EM waves if it can take their energy and turn it into heat--i.e., into vibrations of its atoms (or molecules). But that heat will gradually get transferred, and at least part of it will go into EM radiation again--for example, objects at room temperature emit (mainly) infrared radiation, i.e., EM waves. So the original EM waves didn't get "completely absorbed"; they just got converted into other EM waves.

Similarly, a mass might convert the energy of incoming gravitational waves into heat, but that heat will get radiated away again, and some of it (at least in principle) will be radiated as gravitational waves again. So the gravitational waves won't get "completely absorbed".
 
So even if a gravitational wave from an external source hits a black hole, it will be partially absorbed, but will still be re-emitted? or would it all be converted to hawking radiation?
 
NotASmurf said:
even if a gravitational wave from an external source hits a black hole, it will be partially absorbed, but will still be re-emitted?

Black holes are not ordinary objects, so no, not the way you mean.

NotASmurf said:
or would it all be converted to hawking radiation?

Yes. Technically that counts as "re-emitted", but you distinguished it from other possible ways of being re-emitted, none of which are possible for a black hole.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top