Gravitional force of a particle inside a sphere;

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that the gravitational force exerted on a particle inside a hollow symmetric sphere is zero. The problem is situated within the context of gravitational physics, particularly focusing on the behavior of forces in relation to spherical symmetry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the mathematical setup using polar coordinates and discuss the implications of integrating over different variables. There are attempts to clarify the significance of the sphere being hollow versus solid, with questions about the density and gravitational effects. Some participants suggest simplifying the problem by focusing on specific variables and dropping constants.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing advice on how to approach the problem and questioning the assumptions made about the sphere's properties. There is a recognition of the complexity of the original poster's work, and some guidance has been offered regarding integration and the relevance of the sphere's structure.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the difficulty in interpreting the original poster's mathematical expressions and the potential confusion arising from the distinction between hollow and solid spheres. There is also mention of external resources that may aid understanding.

Benzoate
Messages
420
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the gravitational force exerted on a particle inside a hollow symmetric sphere is zero. [Hint. The proof is the same as for a particle outside a symmetric sphere, except in one detail.]

Homework Equations



F=m1*m2*G/R^2

The Attempt at a Solution



If a particle is going to interact with a sphere, My polar coordinates should be 3-dimensional.

variables will be theta, phi and r.

r hat will be in the direction of the r vector
theta ; rotation in the r-hat, k-hat plane , perpendicular to r-hat.
theta is the angle between the r vector and k vector.

phi-hat rotates about k-hat, in the i hat , j-hat plane
phi is the angle between i-hat and projection of the r vector in the i hat , j hat , plane r*sin(theta)*dphi.

dV= dr*(r*theta)*(r*sin(theta)*d-phi= lim(dr=>0) r^2*dr*(sin(theta)*dtheta)*dphi

sin(theta)*dtheta I think is the solid angle.

Since the horizontal components are i-hat and j-hat, by symmetry, the only component left is the k-hat component.

F=integral(from 0 to a) dr*integral(from 0 to pi) dtheta* integral(0 to pi)dphi*(-G*m(particle)*r^2*sin(theta)/R^2 * (b-r*cos(theta)/R)

R=sqrt((b-r*cos(Theta)^2+(r*sin(theta))^2)
Since symmetry is only around k axis, there isn't any dependence on phi

F=-2*pi*G*m(particle)k-hat((integral(from 0 to a)dr*integral(frome 0 to pi) dtheta integral(no upper or lower limits) r^2*sin(theta)/(R^3) *(b-cos(theta))

F=-2*pi*G*m(particle)k-hat((integral(from 0 to a)r^2*dr*integral(frome 0 to pi)*(b-r*cos(theta)*sin(theta)/(R^3)

R^2=(b-r*cos(theta))^2+(r*sin(theta)^2=b^2-2*b*r+r^2

2*R*dR=2*b*r*sin(theta)*dtheta

(b-r*cos(theta))=2b^2-2*b*r*cos(theta)=R^2+(b^2-r^2)/(2*b)

F=-(2*m*G*m(p)*rho/2b^2) integral(from 0 to a) r^2*dr
F=-(G*4*pi*a^3) *rho*m(particle)/(b^2) k-hat
=-(G*M*m(particle)/b^2 k-hat

Not correct.

I think my R is wrong.

e particle is inside the sphere not outside; Does it make a difference whether or not the sphere is hollow or solid?

Sorry for writing the integrals out in text form. I didn't know how to write out the integrals , whhere you would write out the integral and it would look like an integral you see in a math book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gack! No offense, but that's really hard to read. It's late, so I'll just give you a little advice. Drop the G*m1*m2 factor. It doesn't matter, it's just a constant. Put it in at the end. And yes, it matters that the sphere is hollow, not solid. Don't even integrate over r, just integrate over phi and theta. And, yes, just locate the point along the k-axis.
 
Dick said:
Gack! No offense, but that's really hard to read. It's late, so I'll just give you a little advice. Drop the G*m1*m2 factor. It doesn't matter, it's just a constant. Put it in at the end. And yes, it matters that the sphere is hollow, not solid. Don't even integrate over r, just integrate over phi and theta. And, yes, just locate the point along the k-axis.

Why does it matter if the sphere is hollow or a solid? Is it because a hollow sphere is not as dense as a solid sphere?
 
Dick said:
Gack! No offense, but that's really hard to read. It's late, so I'll just give you a little advice. Drop the G*m1*m2 factor. It doesn't matter, it's just a constant. Put it in at the end. And yes, it matters that the sphere is hollow, not solid. Don't even integrate over r, just integrate over phi and theta. And, yes, just locate the point along the k-axis.

So should I treat r^2 as a constant or should I eliminate r^2*dr altogther? Does r not matter because the particle is within the sphere?
 
Benzoate said:
Why does it matter if the sphere is hollow or a solid? Is it because a hollow sphere is not as dense as a solid sphere?

If the sphere is solid and the particle is inside, then the force is only zero at the center of the sphere. Sorry, I've tried several times to read your work and I'm not doing very well. Here's a fairly lucid exposition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem See if you can follow that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K