How Do Gravitons and Photons Compare in Quantum Theory?

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
Based on the following excerpt, I'd appreciate any general comments/observations and then follow with a specific question.

Leonard Susskind says in THE BLACK HOLE WAR, 2008, PG 347 :

Richard Feynman showed up with a quantum theory of forces...electrically charged particles can emit and absorb photons...every form of matter emits and absorbs gravitons...an electron emits and absorbs about 1019 photons every second (reflecting the electrical force charge#) and a single electron on average takes more time than the entire age of the universe to emit a single graviton (reflecting the force of gravity#).

#: my parenthetical comment

I knew physics was crazy, but that just seems "over the horizon" crazy!

Q: In laymans terms how does quantum theory reflect gravity effects from energy rather than mass? In other words, does it take into account the gravitational equivalency between mass and energy via gravitons... or is there another process?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Naty1,

if you have access to Weinberg's book, you may start the reading of chapter 13 in the first volume. He writes there much better than I could repeat. I may also attempt to present the lines of reasoning if you do not have access to it.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top