Gravitons & Inertia: Do They Cause Each Other?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Usaf Moji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitons Inertia
Usaf Moji
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
Among those who believe in gravitons, is it believed that gravitons cause inertia? This would seem logical to me since gravitational mass is, as far as we can tell, the same as inertial mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gravitational mass and inertial mass are equivalent under the weak argument of General Relativity. Graitons are supposed to mediate the force of gravity on long distances, whilst inertial mass itself is strictly provided by a Higgs Boson.

Would it not be better to say a Higgs provided inertia rather than a graviton, who's job is to send quantum force signals over distances?
 
There are two old papers by Weinberg in which he demonstrates that the quantum theory of a massless spin-2 particle gives you GR so long as you impose the condition that the S-matrix is Lorentz invariant, plus one other condition in each paper. I can't follow all of the arguments, but in case you can:

Weinberg, S;Phys Rev. vol 135, 1964;
-Makes additional assumptions about the pole structure of the S-matrix to demonstrate the equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass.
Weinberg, S;Phys. Lett. vol 9, 1965
-Uses perturbation theory to derive Einstein's equations under the additional assumption that effectively helicity =\pmspin for massless particles.

To boot, he also treats electromagnetism in each, showing the conservation of charge and deriving Maxwell's equations under the same assumptions, but assuming instead the existence of a massless spin-1 particle.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top