Gravity affects quarks at the Planck length and Planck energy

g.lemaitre
Messages
267
Reaction score
2
This comes form the wiki article on quarks:

Having electric charge, mass, color charge, and flavor, quarks are the only known elementary particles that engage in all four fundamental interactions of contemporary physics: electromagnetism, gravitation, strong interaction, and weak interaction. Gravitation is too weak to be relevant to individual particle interactions except at extremes of energy (Planck energy) and distance scales (Planck distance)

Does that mean that when two Quarks come as close to each other as the Planck distance 10-33m then gravity must be taken account if one is to understand their movement?

I know vaguely that the Planck energy is the point at which a black hole forms or something like that but I'm not really sure. Any advice would help out.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Does that mean that when two Quarks come as close to each other as the Planck distance 10-33m then gravity must be taken account if one is to understand their movement?
More or less. Bearing in mind that what really happens at the Planck scale is sheer speculation...

If you confine a particle in a smaller and smaller region, its zero point energy increases. The Compton wavelength is the distance scale ~ħ/mc at which the zero point energy equals the rest mass, and therefore particle number is no longer conserved.

If you confine a mass in a smaller and smaller region, its gravitational potential energy increases. The Schwarzschild radius is the distance scale ~Gm/c2 at which the gravitational potential equals the rest mass.

The Planck scale (Planck distance, Planck mass, Planck energy) is where quantum mechanics and gravitation become equally important, i.e. when the Schwarzschild radius equals the Compton wavelength.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top