B Gravity and spin 2 representation

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
I'm not at all involved in QG but from far away I noticed :

Spin 2 representations are 5x5 matrices.

But in gravity what mathematical objects are quantized ? If it's the metric then it's a 4x4 matrix so that cannot be that.

Or : how does quantization reveal a 5x5 matrix ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jk22 said:
Spin 2 representations are 5x5 matrices.
This is true if, and only if, the object which carries the spin-2 representation has non-zero mass. In this case, the (massive) irreducible spin-2 representation (of the Poincare group) can be represented by a conserved, traceless and symmetric rank-2 tensor field: Consider the symmetric tensor field (i.e., we have 10 components) h^{\mu\nu} = h^{\nu\mu}, take its trace h = \eta_{\rho \sigma}h^{\rho\sigma} then form the following traceless symmetric tensor field G^{\mu\nu} = h^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{4} \eta^{\mu\nu} h . Now G^{\mu\nu} has 10 - 1= 9 components because G^{\mu\nu} = G^{\nu\mu} and \eta_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0. So, to reduce the number of components to 5, we need to impose 4 more conditions: Usually, in field theory G^{\mu\nu} is generated by a conserved source T^{\mu\nu} \ , \partial_{\mu}T^{\mu\nu} = 0, and satisfies the second-order equation ( \partial^{2} + m^{2} ) G^{\mu\nu} = \alpha T^{\mu\nu} \ . Therefore, the required 4 conditions on G^{\mu\nu} are given by \partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0. So, when a tensor field G^{\mu\nu} satisfies the conditions,G^{\mu\nu} = G^{\nu\mu} \ , \eta_{\mu\nu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0 and \partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0, we say that G^{\mu\nu} carries a massive irreducible spin-2 representation of the Poincare group.

In the massless case, we can show that the appropriate tensor is given by G^{\mu\nu} = h^{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} \eta^{\mu\nu} h \ . Notice, in this case, that G^{\mu\nu} is still symmetric, but not traceless. So this tensor has 10 components. Again, we require G^{\mu\nu} to be identically conserved, i.e., \partial_{\mu}G^{\mu\nu} = 0 (because, in this case the equation of motion has the form \partial^{2}G^{\mu\nu} = \beta T^{\mu\nu}). Therefore, the number of components of G^{\mu\nu} has been reduced to 10 - 4 = 6. However, we can show that theory is invariant under the following “gauge” transformations h^{\mu\nu} \to h^{\mu\nu} - \partial^{\mu} \chi^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} \chi^{\mu} \ ,where \chi^{\mu} is an arbitrary 4-vector field. This allows us to fix 4 out of the above 6 components of G^{\mu\nu}. Thus, there are 2 and only 2 independent components left in G^{\mu\nu} as it should be for massless fields. So, the massless “spin”-2 irreducible representation of the Poincare group is carried by a symmetric rank-2 tensor with only 2 independent components.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis, A. Neumaier, Demystifier and 3 others
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top