Gravity and Time Dilation: Are They One and the Same?

Moore1879
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
We all know that velocity produces a time dilation, but gravity does too. My question is "Is the dime dilation produced by gravity the same as that produced by motion?"

As you increase velocity your clocks (the clocks in your frame of reference) remain constant to you, but the clocks in other frames seem to slow, correct?

In a gravitational field do the clocks "outside" seem to slow or do they speed up relative to you? Do observers see your clocks slow or speed?

Thanks.
Moore1879

Forgive any mis-spellings.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GPS is a good example. The GR effect on the clocks in orbit is that they appear from the ground to be running faster than clocks on the ground.
 
Yes, but the other half of my question was would the clocks on Earth seem to slow to the GPS satillites?
 
"We all know that velocity produces a time dilation, but gravity does too. My question is "Is the dime dilation produced by gravity the same as that produced by motion?"

Yes - the time retardation is the same if you consider an object that is moving (for example with circular motion) on a tether of radius r, at velocity v, as that which would be calculated if you considered the centripital acceleration (v^2/r). So since acceleration is equivalent to gravity, you get the same result if you calculate the acceleration that corresponds to a particular gravitational potential as you would get if you calculated the escape velocity at the same radius - - but the total time retardation is either one or the other, but not both. Those who are deciples of the inflow theory find important significance in this correlation in that they see it as a defacto unifaction of GR and SR.

Your other question - in GR, the retardation is a one way phenomena in the sense that the situation is not reciprocal. Specifically, an observer on the surface of the Earth does not see a high altitude clock running slow, but a high altitude observer would conclude that the surface clock is running slow when measured against his high altitude clock.
 
"As you increase velocity your clocks (the clocks in your frame of reference) remain constant to you, but the clocks in other frames seem to slow, correct?"

SR says you measure proper time in your own frame, so clocks at rest in your reference frame always measure the same time - no matter what your velocity with respect to whatever. When it is said in SR that you observe clocks running slow in the other frame, what is meant is that you have synchronized two or more clocks in your own frame and using these clocks you can calculate the rate of a single clock in the other frame that is in relative motion. It does not mean you can shine a light on the face of the other clock and make a measurement - it is a restricted procedure th defined by the interpretation to be accorded the Lorentz transforms.
 
Well, want to be amused about time dilation? Then read my ongoing and humorous essay. Since it is long, I put it on my website (NO SPAM INTENDED).

http://digital-universenow.com/Offers_and_Prices.html

or I can email a word PDF copy if anyone wants..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
313
Replies
88
Views
7K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
54
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Back
Top