Gravity around small black holes

AI Thread Summary
A black hole with a mass similar to the Sun would have a significant gravitational influence, creating distorted gravity fields that could affect nearby orbiting bodies. The stable orbits around such a black hole would be determined by its spin, with the lowest stable orbit at approximately 9 kilometers for a non-rotating black hole. Relativistic effects become pronounced within about 100 kilometers of the black hole, unlike the Sun, which has a much larger size and different gravitational dynamics. The lowest circular orbit, where light can orbit, is around 4.5 kilometers, with anything closer either falling in or escaping. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for studying the behavior of matter near black holes.
Paul Katan
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If a black hole had a mass similar to the Sun (I know black holes tend to be at least three times larger but let's assume an unusual series of events) how far would the are of extremely distorted bent gravity around it be could it cause closely orbiting bodies to be pulled or pushed out of orbit around the black hole?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A black hole has stable orbits around it in the same way all other objects have them. Even better: sun is a bit oblate due to its rotation, which has a notable influence on the perihelion precession of Mercury for example. A black hole is much smaller, so this effect gets much smaller as well.

Relativistic effects become strong very close to the black hole - for 1 solar mass, for distances below ~100 km. There are no orbits around the sun at that distance because sun is much larger, obviously. The lowest stable orbit depends on the spin of the black hole. If it is not rotating, the lowest stable orbit has a radius of about 9 kilometers. The lowest circular orbit is at about 4.5 kilometers (light can orbit here), and everything below that either falls into the black hole or escapes directly.
Note that "radius" is not a trivial concept close to a black hole.
 
Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top