Gravity Decrease in Discs: Rate Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter gonegahgah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the rate of gravitational decrease in a disc compared to a sphere. Inside a sphere, gravity decreases at a constant rate, while outside it decreases with the inverse square law. For a disc, gravity is suggested to decrease linearly from the center to the edge, similar to a sphere, but the transition to a flatter spiral shape in galaxies complicates this. The conversation also touches on the impact of varying density within celestial bodies, questioning whether gravity behaves consistently across different structures. Overall, the complexities of gravitational behavior in discs and their implications for galaxy formation are explored.
gonegahgah
Messages
376
Reaction score
0
Just wondering what the rate of gravitational decrease is in a disc - as opposed to a sphere.

I know the decrease inside a sphere is at a constant rate g1/r but that once you leave the sphere it then decreases at a squared rate g2/r2.

So, while inside a disc at what rate does the gravity decrease if you are moving out from the centre of the disc towards the rim and then when you continue to move away out from the rim?

Also, a what rate does the gravity decrease if you move from the centre away from the disc in a direction perpendicular to the disc?

Can anyone help me with the answer? Thanks if you can.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wouldn't the rate of gravitational decrease within a disc from centre to edge be at a constant rate also; just like for a sphere?

A sphere would create a greater dimple in space-time than a disc but essentially within their confines the change in gravity would be by a linear amount wouldn't it?

If that is so, wouldn't this effect essentially be why galaxies seem to have a constant rate of decrease in gravity outwards.

It changes from a bulge at the centre to a flatter spiral disc shape outwards. So the centre might act more sphere like graduating out to acting more disc like but essentially this would still be a gradual process so that the rate of gravitational decrease would still be fairly linear wouldn't it?

Or are there problems with with I am saying - such as varying density? Just like there is for a planet scenario where the planet is most dense at it's centre. (Are planets most dense at their centre?) Either way planets vary in density in different places so I guess a galaxy would be similar.

Does the above make sense or am I completely off track?
 
Hi Nik. Thanks, but doesn't really tell me my answer.
 
Gravity works according to an inverse square law: \vec{F}=\frac{GMm\vec{r}}{|\vec{r}|^3}\Rightarrow{}|\vec{F}|=\frac{GMm}{|\vec{r}|^2}where G is the universal gravitational constant, M is the mass of one (spherically symmetric or very small) object, m is the mass of the another (similar) object, and r is the vector from one to the other. There is a mathematical property of inverse square laws called http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_theorem" of the disk. Note that the acceleration is a constant independent of one's distance from the center of the disk (this property depends on the density being a constant in terms of r and assumes the disk to be of infinitesimal thickness).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top