Gravity Fed Farm Animal Watering System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and functionality of a gravity-fed self-filling drinking station for farm animals, specifically goats and cows. Participants explore potential issues with the proposed design, which aims to utilize gravity and vacuum to refill a water bowl automatically. The conversation touches on practical considerations, alternative solutions, and the feasibility of the design in real-world applications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that the design may lead to the entire contents of the rain barrel flowing into the water bowl if the vacuum is lost due to evaporation.
  • Another participant argues that the vacuum in the system would be lost incrementally, suggesting that the design would not function as a continuous refill system and would instead operate in a "batch" manner.
  • A suggestion is made to use a float valve system, similar to that used in toilets, as a simpler and more effective solution for maintaining water levels.
  • Concerns are raised about the cleanliness of rainwater and the potential accumulation of dirt in low-lying pipes, which could affect the quality of water provided to livestock.
  • One participant humorously comments on the title of the thread, while another proposes a business idea related to the discussion.
  • A later reply emphasizes the need for a vented barrel to fill properly, but notes that this could lead to drainage issues.
  • Participants discuss the importance of having a reliable water source for livestock, with one noting that cows can drink significant amounts of water daily.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with some agreeing on the inadequacies of the original design while others propose alternative solutions. There is no consensus on the best approach, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal design for a gravity-fed watering system.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various limitations of the proposed design, including the need for proper venting, the potential for water contamination, and the challenges of maintaining a vacuum system. These factors contribute to the complexity of creating an effective self-filling watering station.

FarmerTodd
Messages
3
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Will this "design" work
I am trying to design/build a large self-filling drinking station, aka water bowl, for my goats and cow (see design attached)
Self-Sustaining Watering Station.png
. It's a takeoff of a dog's self-filling water bowl, i.e., uses gravity and vacuum to automatically refill the bowl as the water in the bowl is drank. The rain barrel is 50 gallons. The Water bowl is about 10 gallons.

What issues do you foresee with this design? I'm thinking the entire contents of the rain barrel will flow into the water bowl (overfilling it) if the water in the downspout evaporates as the vacuum will be lost.

Or what happens if the bowl is full, the barrel has water in it but is below the inlet on the downspout side, and it rains cats and dogs? Will the weight of the water in the downspout force the air out of the rain barrel and bubble out of the bowl or will the barrel not fill any further.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I read the title and thought "Wow - you can feed livestock gravity! What will they think of next!"
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: FarmerTodd
This is not a good rig.
The vacuum in the pet bowl is lost incrementally as the level in the water bowl lowers. Every time it gets low enough, air pulled in from the bowl into the barrel and then the water level in the rain barrel lowers, allowing a bolus of water into the bowl. Repeat until barrel is empty. This is a "batch" process and will not work as you envisage as a continuous one.
There is a reason the bathroom toilet has a float valve...same idea and its the simplest and cheapest way to go. Barn feeds big tall tank which feeds the water trough through a float valve shutoff. The good news is a toilet tank valve costs $6 and you don't even need a feed-thru in the watering trough if you are clever.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rive and 256bits
Vanadium 50 said:
I read the title and thought "Wow - you can feed livestock gravity! What will they think of next!"
Cows would lactate heavy cream...I apologize...
 
wow, great comments. That gives me a new idea. Build a gravity feeder and corner the 'heavy cream' market.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G
Paging one of our more experienced ME/Farmers... @Rx7man :smile:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and Rx7man
berkeman said:
Paging one of our more experienced ME/Farmers... @Rx7man :smile:
I'm flattered!

Biggest problem I see is that a cow can drink 30 gallon a day no problem

I wouldn't try an have any vacuum system, just mount a barrel as high as reasonably possible so it's still lower than the gutter, and have a pretty generic float valve in the bowl

Second problem with your design as shown is when it rains, the barrell would have to be vented in order to fill, but venting the barrell will cause everything in it to drain out the water bowl
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Rive, hutchphd and berkeman
Additional problem is, that the low laid pipes will never dry out and hard to clean: all the dirt from rainwater will accumulate there.

Livestock needs fresh, clean water. Unless it is absolute necessary/unavoidable I would not feed them rainwater, especially if it's kept still for indefinite time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rx7man
Thanks all for the feedback. Didn't expect my design to be compared to a toilet, but it sounds like that's where it belongs. Guess it's time and rethink this idea. Stay tuned and thanks again.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: 256bits and berkeman
  • #10
FarmerTodd said:
Didn't expect my design to be compared to a toilet
Hey, it was a technical comparison only! :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: FarmerTodd
  • #11
FarmerTodd said:
Thanks all for the feedback. Didn't expect my design to be compared to a toilet, but it sounds like that's where it belongs. Guess it's time and rethink this idea. Stay tuned and thanks again.
Hey, the Thomas Crapper design is one of the most successful and widespread inventions in the world! So no sleight intended.
Seriously, if you do come up with a better way to do this, particularly one with few moving parts, please post it. I have never figured a way to do it without essentially a float valve...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FarmerTodd
  • #12
FarmerTodd said:
Thanks all for the feedback. Didn't expect my design to be compared to a toilet, but it sounds like that's where it belongs. Guess it's time and rethink this idea. Stay tuned and thanks again.
Your funny. Made me laugh.

Think float valve within a carburetor, used so that the gasoline doesn't all run out of the fuel tank and flood the system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K