Gravity for a point inside the earth

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the gravitational force experienced at a point inside a perfectly spherical Earth, one can utilize Newton's Shell Theorem, which simplifies the integration process. The gravitational force per unit mass at a point inside the Earth can be derived using spherical coordinates and involves integrating over the volume of the Earth while considering the contributions from different mass elements. The key insight is that the gravitational forces from mass elements outside the radius of the point cancel each other out due to symmetry, leaving only the mass inside the radius contributing to the gravitational force. The integration process involves careful handling of the spherical coordinates and applying the inverse square law. Ultimately, this leads to a clear understanding of how gravity behaves within a uniform spherical mass.
loup
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Assume the Earth is a perfect sphere,

How do we calculate that a point inside the Earth's gravity it experienced?

I know about the formula which is taught in high school. I just cannot understand how it is proved. I know it is related to the integration. Can anybody give some hints to me about how to do the integration?

I am so puzzled.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
loup said:
I know about the formula which is taught in high school.
What formula are you thinking of?

You might want to look up Newton's Shell theorems, which deal with this.
 
loup said:
Assume the Earth is a perfect sphere,

How do we calculate that a point inside the Earth's gravity it experienced?

I know about the formula which is taught in high school. I just cannot understand how it is proved. I know it is related to the integration. Can anybody give some hints to me about how to do the integration?

I am so puzzled.


You can do this the hard way, by setting up an integral and derive the answers.

This is a more primitive technique than utilizing Newton's shell theorem directly.
 
I'll help you along a bit with your integration:

Let your point, as measured from the centre of the Earth have position vector \vec{r}_{0}=z_{0}\vec{k}

The force \vec{f}_{0} per unit mass located at \vec{r}_{0} as acted upon by a uniformly massed ball of radius R and density \rho is given by the integral:
\vec{f}_{0}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{R}\frac{G\rho(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0})}{||\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0}||^{3}}r^{2}\sin\phi{dr}d\phi{d}\theta, \vec{r}=r(\sin\phi\cos\theta\vec{i}+\sin\phi\sin\theta\vec{j}+\cos\phi\vec{k})


From this, you should first verify that the force is zero in the i and j-directions, before proceeding further!
 
arildno said:
I'll help you along a bit with your integration:

Let your point, as measured from the centre of the Earth have position vector \vec{r}_{0}=z_{0}\vec{k}

The force \vec{f}_{0} per unit mass located at \vec{r}_{0} as acted upon by a uniformly massed ball of radius R and density \rho is given by the integral:
\vec{f}_{0}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{R}\frac{G\rho(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0})}{||\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0}||^{3}}r^{2}\sin\phi{dr}d\phi{d}\theta, \vec{r}=r(\sin\phi\cos\theta\vec{i}+\sin\phi\sin\theta\vec{j}+\cos\phi\vec{k})


From this, you should first verify that the force is zero in the i and j-directions, before proceeding further!

I am sorry. I just don't know what exactly you are talking about. Can you explain more about what you are doing?
 
Okay, let us take this step by step!

Suppose we have some mass object P located at \vec{r}_{0}, with mass m.

Let an object O fill some region R, so that location \vec{r} within R designates a mass point of mass dM=\rho{dV}, where \rho is the local density.

Thus, we have that the force from O upon P must be given by:
\vec{F}_{0}=-\int_{R}\frac{GmdM}{||\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}||^{2}}\vec{i}{r},\vec{i}{r}=\frac{\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}}{||\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}||}

Thus, this may be rewritten as:
\vec{f}_{0}=\frac{\vec{F}_{0}}{m}=\int_{R}\frac{G\rho(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0})}{||\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}||^{3}}dV

Do you agree to this?
 
Now, let R be a ball, let the origin be the ball's centre, so that in spherical coordinates, the points of the ball constitute the region:
0\leq{r}\leq{R},0\leq\theta\leq{2\pi},0\leq\phi\leq\pi
Thus, the position vector, expressed by the constant Cartesian unit vectors may be written as:
\vec{r}=r(\sin\phi\cos\theta\vec{i}+\sin\phi\sin\theta\vec{j}+\cos\phi\vec{k})

No loss of generality is made by aligning the \vec{k}-vector along the line from the ball's centre to the mass point at \vec{r}_{0}, i.e, we get:
\vec{r}_{0}=z_0\vec{k} for some constant z0.

Is that okay?
 
But if P is inside the ball. Isn't that not only the things nearer than P to the centre contributes to the gravity, but also the things outside P?

I know the things outside P will cancel each other, but how to prove the things outside P will cancel each other ?
 
loup said:
But if P is inside the ball. Isn't that not only the things nearer than P to the centre contributes to the gravity, but also the things outside P?

I know the things outside P will cancel each other, but how to prove the things outside P will cancel each other ?

It's very simple. Draw a thin spherical shell. Put some off-center point inside. This is the arbitrary point where we want to know the gravitational force on the point. Imagine two thin cones extending from the point to opposite areas on the shell.

The area of the shell within each cone depends upon how far it is from the point in question. The volume of matter in each patch is proportional to the area. The area is proportional to the distance squared of the patch from the shell. You should be able to convince yourself that this is so by drawing some simple diagrams. The force from each little patch of the shell is complimented be the force from the opposite patch. This is from the inverse square law. The contribuations from all the little patches is zero.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
loup said:
But if P is inside the ball. Isn't that not only the things nearer than P to the centre contributes to the gravity, but also the things outside P?

I know the things outside P will cancel each other, but how to prove the things outside P will cancel each other ?
You will know by performing the actual calculations!

Now, let us take the easy bits here:

In spherical coordinates, we have dV=r^{2}\sin\phi{d\theta}d\phi{dr}

Furthermore, we have:
||\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0}||=\sqrt{r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi}
which you can readily establish, say with reference to the law of cosines, or by laborious calculation.

Thus, let us look at the i-th component of the integral.
This simply reads:
f_{0,i}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin^{2}\phi\cos\theta}{(\sqrt{r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi})^{3}}d\theta{d\phi}{dr}

Assuming the density to be constant, the full \theta-period involved in the integration implies that this becomes 0.
Similarly for the j'th component.

Agreed so far?
 
  • #11
aridno, I agree with what you say. Thank you very much.
 
  • #12
Okay!

Let us proceed with the component in the k-direction.
This reads, after the \theta-integration:
f_{0,k}=2\pi\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin\phi(r\cos\phi-z_{0})}{(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{\frac{3}{2}}}d\phi{d}r

Ok?
 
  • #13
Now, we will perform a partial integration on \phi

Note that:
\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}=-\frac{rz_{0}\sin\phi}{(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{\frac{3}{2}}}

Looks awfully similar, doesn't it?

Thus, we may rewrite our integral as:
f_{0,k}=-2\pi\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}(r\cos\phi-z_{0})}{z_{0}}\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi{d}r

Thus, partial integration yields:
f_{0,k}=-(2\pi\int_{0}^{R}(\frac{G\rho{r}(r\cos\phi-z_{0})}{z_{0}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}})_{\phi=0}^{\phi=\pi}dr+\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin\phi}{z_{0}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi{d}r)=
-(2\pi\int_{0}^{R}\frac{G\rho{r}}{z_{0}}(-\frac{r+z_{0}}{|r+z_{0}|}-\frac{r-z_{0}}{|r-z_{0}|}dr+\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin\phi}{z_{0}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi{d}r)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
I group what Arildno's for a clearer overview

arildno said:
I'll help you along a bit with your integration:

Let your point, as measured from the centre of the Earth have position vector \vec{r}_{0}=z_{0}\vec{k}

The force \vec{f}_{0} per unit mass located at \vec{r}_{0} as acted upon by a uniformly massed ball of radius R and density \rho is given by the integral:
\vec{f}_{0}=\int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{R}\frac{G\rho(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0})}{||\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0}||^{3}}r^{2}\sin\phi{dr}d\phi{d}\theta, \vec{r}=r(\sin\phi\cos\theta\vec{i}+\sin\phi\sin\theta\vec{j}+\cos\phi\vec{k})


From this, you should first verify that the force is zero in the i and j-directions, before proceeding further!

arildno said:
Okay, let us take this step by step!

Suppose we have some mass object P located at \vec{r}_{0}, with mass m.

Let an object O fill some region R, so that location \vec{r} within R designates a mass point of mass dM=\rho{dV}, where \rho is the local density.

Thus, we have that the force from O upon P must be given by:
\vec{F}_{0}=-\int_{R}\frac{GmdM}{||\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}||^{2}}\vec{i}{r},\vec{i}{r}=\frac{\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}}{||\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}||}

Thus, this may be rewritten as:
\vec{f}_{0}=\frac{\vec{F}_{0}}{m}=\int_{R}\frac{G\rho(\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0})}{||\vec{r}_{0}-\vec{r}||^{3}}dV

Do you agree to this?

arildno said:
Now, let R be a ball, let the origin be the ball's centre, so that in spherical coordinates, the points of the ball constitute the region:
0\leq{r}\leq{R},0\leq\theta\leq{2\pi},0\leq\phi\leq\pi
Thus, the position vector, expressed by the constant Cartesian unit vectors may be written as:
\vec{r}=r(\sin\phi\cos\theta\vec{i}+\sin\phi\sin\theta\vec{j}+\cos\phi\vec{k})

No loss of generality is made by aligning the \vec{k}-vector along the line from the ball's centre to the mass point at \vec{r}_{0}, i.e, we get:
\vec{r}_{0}=z_0\vec{k} for some constant z0.

Is that okay?

arildno said:
You will know by performing the actual calculations!

Now, let us take the easy bits here:

In spherical coordinates, we have dV=r^{2}\sin\phi{d\theta}d\phi{dr}

Furthermore, we have:
||\vec{r}-\vec{r}_{0}||=\sqrt{r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi}
which you can readily establish, say with reference to the law of cosines, or by laborious calculation.

Thus, let us look at the i-th component of the integral.
This simply reads:
f_{0,i}=\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\pi}\int_{0}^{2\pi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin^{2}\phi\cos\theta}{(\sqrt{r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi})^{3}}d\theta{d\phi}{dr}

Assuming the density to be constant, the full \theta-period involved in the integration implies that this becomes 0.
Similarly for the j'th component.

Agreed so far?

arildno said:
Okay!

Let us proceed with the component in the k-direction.
This reads, after the \theta-integration:
f_{0,k}=2\pi\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin\phi(r\cos\phi-z_{0})}{(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{\frac{3}{2}}}d\phi{d}r

Ok?

arildno said:
Now, we will perform a partial integration on \phi

Note that:
\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}=-\frac{rz_{0}\sin\phi}{(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{\frac{3}{2}}}

Looks awfully similar, doesn't it?

Thus, we may rewrite our integral as:
f_{0,k}=-2\pi\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}(r\cos\phi-z_{0})}{z_{0}}\frac{\partial}{\partial\phi}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi{d}r

Thus, partial integration yields:
f_{0,k}=-(2\pi\int_{0}^{R}(\frac{G\rho{r}(r\cos\phi-z_{0})}{z_{0}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}})_{\phi=0}^{\phi=\pi}dr+\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin\phi}{z_{0}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi{d}r)=
-(2\pi\int_{0}^{R}\frac{G\rho{r}}{z_{0}}(-\frac{r+z_{0}}{|r+z_{0}|}-\frac{r-z_{0}}{|r-z_{0}|}dr+\int_{0}^{R}\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}^{2}\sin\phi}{z_{0}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi{d}r)
 
  • #15
The latter integral can be evaluated as follows:
\int_{0}^{\phi}\frac{G\rho{r}}{z_{0}^{2}}rz_{0}\sin\phi(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{-\frac{1}{2}}d\phi=\frac{G\rho{r}}{z_{0}^{2}}(r^{2}+z_{0}^{2}-2rz_{0}\cos\phi)^{\frac{1}{2}}\mid_{\phi=0}^{\phi=\pi}=\frac{G\rho{r}}{z_{0}^{2}}(|r+z_{0}|-|r-z_{0}|)
 
  • #16
Thus, combining, we get:
f_{0,k}=-\frac{2\pi{G}\rho}{z_{0}}\int_{0}^{R}(-r(\frac{r+z_{0}}{|r+z_{0}|}+\frac{r-z_{0}}{|r-z_{0}})+\frac{r}{z_{0}}(|r+z_{0}|-|r-z_{0}|)dr
 
  • #17
Note that if z_0 is GREATER than any r between 0 and R, this yields:
f_{0,k}=-\frac{2\pi{G\rho}}{z_{0}}\int_{0}^{R}(-r(1-1)+\frac{r}{z_{0}}(r+z_{0}-(z_{0}-r))dr=-\frac{2\pi{G\rho}}{z_{0}}\int_{0}^{R}\frac{2r^{2}}{z_{0}}dr=-\frac{4\pi{G\rho}R^{3}}{3z_{0}^{2}}=-\frac{GM}{z_{0}^{2}}
which agrees with what we should have when our point lies outside the sphere.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Note that for r-values GREATER than z_{0}, the integrand becomes:
(-r(\frac{r+z_{0}}{|r+z_{0}|}+\frac{r-z_{0}}{|r-z_{0}|})+\frac{r}{z_{0}}(|r+z_{0}|-|r-z_{0}|)=-r(1+1)+\frac{r}{z_{0}}(r+z_{0}-r+z_{0})=-2r+2r=0

This agrees with the result of the shell method, namely that for a point within a hollow sphere, the net force from that hollow sphere equals zero.

Thus, only the sphere with radius 0\leq{r}\leq{z_{0}}(\leq{R}) counts, and from the previous post, we see we get the result:
f_{0,k}=-\frac{4\pi{G}\rho{z}_{0}^{3}}{3z_{0}^{2}}=-\frac{4\pi}{3}G\rho{z}_{0}
 
  • #19
It must be the most difficult integration so far I have encountered. But at the same time, it fasinates me.

What is the next step, arildno?
 
  • #20
As long as you have understood the steps we have been through, we are basically finished.
 
  • #21
That means I have not fully understood what you have said...
It seems that I have to try harder
 
  • #22
Post 18 contains the answer to your original question.
 
  • #23
Yes, I saw that.

Anyway, thanks for your help really. I will study all the posts you have posted seriously.
 
Back
Top