Gravity & Inertia: Proportional to Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deechan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Inertia
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between gravitational force, mass, and inertia. It questions how gravitational force can be proportional to mass if inertia opposes changes in a body's state. A participant points out a logical flaw in the initial reasoning, comparing it to measuring debt in currency. The conversation shifts to acknowledge that the principles of force, including F=ma, apply to various forces beyond gravity. The exchange concludes with a realization about the broader applicability of these concepts.
deechan
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
If force is something that changes the state of a body and inertia is opposition to change of state how can gravitational force be proportional to mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
deechan said:
If force is something that changes the state of a body and inertia is opposition to change of state how can gravitational force be proportional to mass?

Why can't it?

There's a fault in your logic here. It's as if you're asking "If having money is considered as wealth, then when I go in debt, why do they measure my debt in {insert currency here}?"

Furthermore, why restrict this to just gravitational force? Are you saying that you understand why F=ma is OK for other types of forces?

Zz.
 
Oh!I didn't think of other forces at all.I think I get it now.Thank you.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top