Gravity problem - change in g due to oil pocket

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the difference in gravitational acceleration (g) above a spherical oil pocket located 1.40 km beneath the Earth's surface. Participants emphasize the need to treat the Earth as having uniform density, except for the oil pocket, and to calculate the gravitational attraction of the oil pocket on an object directly above it. There is confusion regarding the correct method to determine the gravitational force, particularly in how to account for the mass of the oil pocket versus the mass of the Earth it displaces. Clarifications are sought on the calculations and the significance of the distance from the Earth's center to the oil pocket. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding gravitational attraction in the context of uniform density assumptions.
deuce123
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The center of a 1.40 km diameter spherical pocket of oil is 1.40 km beneath the Earth's surface.

Estimate by what percentage g directly above the pocket of oil would differ from the expected value of g for a uniform Earth? Assume the density of oil is 8.0×102kg/m3.

Homework Equations


F=(m1m2G)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the mass for the pocket of oil, then subtracted the distance its beneath the Earth from the Earth's radius for the length, I ended up getting F=1.1x10^13N, and from here on I'm lost. I divided that number by the oils mass (1.12x10^12kg) and got a number close to g, then got a percentage for the difference, but it's still incorrect. Someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
deuce123 said:
subtracted the distance its beneath the Earth from the Earth's radius for the length,
Length of what?

Can you calculate the attraction you should feel (at the surface) towards the sphere of oil?
Note that it says "uniform Earth". I.e. you are to pretend the Earth has uniform density, apart from the oil pocket.
On that basis, what would be the gravitational attraction to the sphere of Earth that the oil has replaced?
 
haruspex said:
Length of what?

Can you calculate the attraction you should feel (at the surface) towards the sphere of oil?
Note that it says "uniform Earth". I.e. you are to pretend the Earth has uniform density, apart from the oil pocket.
On that basis, what would be the gravitational attraction to the sphere of Earth that the oil has replaced?
I'm confused as too what you mean, do you mean calculate the attraction between the sphere of oil and Earth if it were at Earth's surface? And for the second part you mean consider the sphere of oil as a part of the mass of earth? ( remove a portion of the Earth of same size and get the total change in mass??) Can you also explain why the method I use did not work out, I'm interested as too why it didn't work. And for L I mean the length from the center of the Earth to the center of the sphere of oil
 
deuce123 said:
do you mean calculate the attraction between the sphere of oil and Earth if it were at Earth's surface?
No. Consider an object on the surface of the Earth, directly above the oil pocket. What gravitational attraction, (as an acceleration) does the oil pocket have for the object? In this part, ignore the Earth.
deuce123 said:
for the second part you mean consider the sphere of oil as a part of the mass of earth?
No. As in the first part, I am asking about the attraction towards the pocket. But in this case, consider the pocket as occupied by earth, not by oil.
deuce123 said:
for L I mean the length from the center of the Earth to the center of the sphere of oil
Why is that interesting? What equation did you plug that into and on what basis?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top