Gravity shift due to sun & moon passing overhead

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on understanding the variations in gravitational force experienced on Earth's surface due to the positions of the sun and moon, as well as the influence of tides. Participants explore mathematical approaches and experimental methods to quantify these changes, particularly in the context of a precision pendulum experiment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a function or approach to describe gravitational changes due to the sun and moon, indicating familiarity with the fundamentals but lacking advanced mathematical skills.
  • Another participant references Newton's law of gravitation to explain how the gravitational attraction of the sun and moon affects both Earth and a small mass, suggesting a method to calculate the difference in acceleration.
  • A participant discusses building a precision pendulum to measure small gravitational changes, referencing a previous experiment that identified multiple frequencies related to solar and lunar influences.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of measuring tidal effects, which are suggested to be on the order of one part in ten million.
  • Another participant emphasizes the high precision achievable with pendulum clocks, noting that even minor changes in pendulum length can significantly affect timekeeping.
  • There is a mention of the need for a precision of ten milliseconds per day to detect the direct gravitational attraction of the moon and sun, highlighting the challenges of timing accuracy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of optimism about the feasibility of measuring gravitational changes with a pendulum, but there is no consensus on the specific mathematical approaches or the practical challenges involved in such measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of evaluating tidal effects and the precision required for measurements, indicating that assumptions about the uniformity of gravitational influence may not hold in practice.

corndodger
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I would like to know a function or at least an approach toward developing a function that describes the change of gravity on the Earth's surface due to the sun, moon and if possible, the tides.

I am quite familiar with the fundamentals but my math isn't up to this.

Thanks in advance,

the corndodger
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's law of gravitation: ##F=\frac{GMm}{r^2}##
As acceleration of a small mass on Earth (small compared to the mass of earth) and if we ignore the direction, this can be simplified to ##a=\frac{GM}{r^2}## where G is the gravitational constant, M is some big mass and r is the distance to the center of this mass.
Moon and sun are not just attracting your small mass, they are attracting Earth as well. If Earth and the small mass are accelerated in the same way, you do not see this (on earth), so the difference between the acceleration of Earth and the acceleration of your mass is relevant. If the object is just over your head:
##\Delta a=\frac{GM}{r^2} - a=\frac{GM}{(r+r_e)^2}## where re is the radius of Earth (it is possible to simplify the formula a bit, if necessary). You can use the known parameters of the solar system to estimate those numbers for moon and sun. I did the same a few weeks ago here, where the second list is relevant.
 
Thanks for your reply. I am building a precision pendulum complete with data logging to try to measure these microscopic gravitational changes. This was done once before in the '80s using an old astronomical pendulum from the 1920s. He collected a month or two of data, then fft'd and it showed 6 (I believe) different frequencies, sun, moon, tides (he was on the west coast) and some identifiable Earth resonances.

I have the electronics controller built and operational and am working on the pendulum. I understand the Newtonian formulae you've provided, but I'm still stuck calculating the difference between having the sun directly overhead and being on the other side of the world. Plus the difference the moon makes as it crosses overhead, say, between you and the sun.

This mathematical exercise is just to try to get an idea of the order of magnitude between the two signals. I really wonder how deep in the noise these signals are buried.
 
Sun/Moon directly below gives (nearly*) the same influence, just in the opposite direction.
Moon/Sun in horizontal direction attract Earth and the test mass in the same way, so this cancels.
(Direct) tidal effects are ~1 part in 10 millions, this will be hard to achieve with a pendulum I think.

*they are not always in the same distance anyway, and that gives more deviation from the averaged values.
 
Well made pendulums and mechanical clockworks give far better resolution of time than you might think. Consider a day of 84600 seconds, pendulum clocks can consistently give time within a second a day...that's a resolution of 1/84600 = 0.00001182. so we're talking about millionths. It takes only in the millionths of an inch change in pendulum length to make a second or two a day change in timekeeping.

So humor my steam punkness, I want to see for myself what a pendulum can actually do. For all I know they may be sensitive to solar flares, dark matter or detect gravity waves given the right performance analysis.

jim
 
pendulum clocks can consistently give time within a second a day
You need a precision of 10 milliseconds per day to see the direct attraction by moon and sun. And there is an additional problem: Sun has a period of one day, so your clock has to be able to display the time with a precision of a few milliseconds or better.
The tides on Earth should be easier to measure, but they are more complicated to evaluate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
27K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K