Gravity Waves: Energy Transfer from Observation

NC_Seattle
Messages
12
Reaction score
7
I'd be interested in hearing some thoughts on this.

Does the fact that a set of gravity waves were observed imply that some energy, presumably a very small amount, was transferred from the gravity wave to observing instruments? If so, where in the apparatus and how did this transfer occur?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NC_Seattle said:
If so, where in the apparatus and how did this transfer occur?
The gravity waves simply pass through matter similar to how sound passes through matter. As the waves passed over the interferometer arms it changed the length ever so slightly but enough to be measured then they returned to their normal length. I don't think gravity waves "change" matter or "change" back into matter, they just dissipating energy.
 
NC_Seattle said:
Does the fact that a set of gravity waves were observed imply that some energy, presumably a very small amount, was transferred from the gravity wave to observing instruments? If so, where in the apparatus and how did this transfer occur?

Yes, the waves caused the arms of the interferometers to oscillate in length. Those oscillations had kinetic and potential energy.

Historically, there was a lot of confusion on this point. Feynman came up with an argument called the sticky bead argument to demonstrate that gravitational waves would carry energy and could donate energy to an antenna: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sticky_bead_argument
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
bcrowell said:
Feynman came up with an argument called the sticky bead argument

As an amusing historical note, Feynman apparently came up with this out of frustration with other scientists at the Chapel Hill conference, who he felt were stuck in abstract math instead of looking at the physics, and as a result were confusing themselves unnecessarily. In a letter he wrote from the conference (to his wife Gweneth, IIRC--I read about this in the foreword to the Feynman Lectures on Gravitation), he said something like "This is what comes of looking for conserved tensors, etc., instead of asking: can the waves do work?"
 
  • Like
Likes jerromyjon
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top