Gravity Waves: Measure Spacetime Stretch with a Ruler

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of spacetime stretching due to gravitational waves, particularly whether a ruler can effectively measure such changes and how this compares to the methods used by detectors like LIGO. Participants explore the implications of spacetime stretching on perceived distances between objects and the limitations of different measurement techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether spacetime stretching would be noticeable if measured with a ruler, suggesting that both the ruler and the marks would stretch together.
  • It is proposed that if the stretching were significant, one might perceive objects as being farther apart, but this perception depends on the measurement method used.
  • One participant explains that while a ruler would stretch with the gravitational wave, internal forces within the ruler complicate the measurement, making it difficult to predict its response accurately.
  • The LIGO detector's method of using laser beams is highlighted as a different approach that avoids the complexities of material properties, relying instead on changes in round-trip travel times of light due to spacetime stretching.
  • Another participant suggests that for a slow spacetime stretch, a ruler could measure distances similarly to LIGO's lasers, but emphasizes the need for careful isolation from external influences and precise measurement techniques.
  • There is a discussion about the concept of a "perfect ruler" and how laser beams serve as a practical approximation for precise measurements in the context of defining the meter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of rulers versus laser beams for measuring spacetime stretching, with no consensus reached on the best method or the implications of significant stretching.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of measuring spacetime stretching due to gravitational waves, including the influence of internal forces in materials and the conditions under which measurements are taken.

Albertgauss
Gold Member
Messages
297
Reaction score
37
Hi all,

On the website of gravity waves by PhD comics:



At minute 1 and 5 seconds to minute 1 minute 20 secs.

"Now if the spacetime between you and me stretched or compressed, we wouldn't notice it if we had made marks on our metaphorical sheet...because these marks would also get stretched."

Does this mean only for trying to measure the stretch of spacetime with a ruler?

I understand that gravity waves are incredibly weak, but if the stretching was significant, things would certainly spread out as I would perceive them, it seems, and I would at least notice that objects formerly close to me are now farther away? Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Albertgauss said:
I understand that gravity waves are incredibly weak, but if the stretching was significant, things would certainly spread out as I would perceive them, it seems, and I would at least notice that objects formerly close to me are now farther away?

It depends on how you measure the distance. If you measure it with a ruler, the ruler would (at least to a first approximation) stretch with the wave. But only to a first approximation, because the ruler has internal forces between its atoms, which would resist the stretching. To make a detailed prediction of how the ruler would respond, you would have to know the details of the internal forces, which are very difficult to calculate.

The LIGO detector, which has been in the news because of its detection of gravitational waves (btw, the term "gravity waves" refers to a different phenomenon, one which has nothing to do with GR), uses a different principle: it has laser beams traveling back and forth along two arms. Stretching or squeezing of the arms due to a passing gravitational wave causes the round-trip travel times of the laser beams to vary, providing a measure of distance (lengths of the arms) that doesn't involve difficult to model properties of materials like a ruler does. (At least, this is how it looks in the most commonly used coordinates; since this is relativity, "length" and "time" are coordinate dependent, so one has to be careful when describing what is on.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72 and vanhees71
Albertgauss said:
Hi all,

On the website of gravity waves by PhD comics:



At minute 1 and 5 seconds to minute 1 minute 20 secs.

"Now if the spacetime between you and me stretched or compressed, we wouldn't notice it if we had made marks on our metaphorical sheet...because these marks would also get stretched."

Does this mean only for trying to measure the stretch of spacetime with a ruler?

I understand that gravity waves are incredibly weak, but if the stretching was significant, things would certainly spread out as I would perceive them, it seems, and I would at least notice that objects formerly close to me are now farther away? Is this correct?


For a slow space-time stretch, a ruler will measure the same thing that the lasers Ligo uses. You could create "marks" by putting rocks way out in empty space far away from any mass, and use rulers to measure the distance between the rocks. The GW's would make the rocks move relative to the ruler, except at the midpoint of the ruler. So, the further away the freely-floating masses were from the center of the ruler, the more the masses would move relative to the ruler. Here on Earth, you'd need to hang the rocks from strings to counter gravity (rather than having them float weightlessly). You'd also need to carefully isolate these masses from vibrations and external influences of all sorts, and use extremely precise rulers. This is essentially how Ligo works, with the lasers acting essentially as very precise rulers.

A perfect ruler is a rather abstract concept that doesn't actually exist. Properly implemented, laser beams are an excellent approximation to a good ruler, even though they are not perfect. They are so good that they are essentially the basis for the SI definition of the meter, which is : http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/meter.html
"The meter is the length of the path traveled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second."
 
pervect said:
For a slow space-time stretch, a ruler will measure the same thing that the lasers Ligo uses.

"Slow" here meaning "slow enough that the stress induced in the ruler does not have any measurable effect on its length". But this also implicitly assumes that the stretching is periodic (stretch, then squeeze, then stretch, then squeeze), which is true of a gravitational wave, and of small amplitude, which is true of a gravitational wave as long as the ruler is not too close to the source.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K