Undergrad GRE related question in Quantum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gre Quantum
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a GRE practice problem involving the kinetic energy of a covalently bonded electron in a chlorine molecule. The solution employs the uncertainty principle, using the bond length of 100 pm to derive momentum and subsequently energy. There is confusion regarding the application of the uncertainty principle, as the bond length is a fixed value, not an uncertainty. Additionally, questions arise about the validity of using momentum uncertainty to calculate actual energy. The conversation highlights the complexities of quantum mechanics and the interpretation of the uncertainty principle in this context.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I was doing a GRE practice test and I came across this problem: The chlorine molecule consists of two chlorine atoms joined together by a covalent bond with length approximately 100 pm. What is the approximate kinetic energy of one if the covalently bonded electrons? And in their solution they use uncertainty principle: (100 pm)(delta p) = h => delta p = 2keV/c and then they plug this into E = p^2/2m. This is also what I would do during the exam, given the information provided by the problem. However, I am a bit confused about the correctness of the solution. The 100 pm is the actual length not the uncertainty in the length, so why can we use uncertainty principle like that? And even if that would be the case, how can you use the uncertainty in the momentum, to get the actual energy, using E = p^2/2m? Isn't something wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:
why can we use uncertainty principle like that
Because the expectation values of both ##x## and ##p## are zero from symmetry
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K