Graduate Green's function for Stokes equation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Green's functions to the Stokes equations in Cartesian coordinates, particularly for a point force. The initial equations are manipulated to express pressure and velocity fields in terms of Green's functions, leading to the conclusion that pressure is a scalar and does not require a bold symbol. The Green's function for the 3D Laplacian is identified as -1/(4πr), and the relationship between the pressure and the force is established through integrals involving delta functions. The final expressions for pressure and velocity are derived, showing their dependence on the force vector and the spatial variable. This analysis highlights the linearity of the solutions concerning the applied force in fluid dynamics.
steve1763
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How do I reach the expression for pressure?
So I've just started learning about Greens functions and I think there is some confusion. We start with the Stokes equations in Cartesian coords for a point force.

$$-\nabla \textbf{P} + \nu \nabla^2 \textbf{u} + \textbf{F}\delta(\textbf{x})=0$$
$$\nabla \cdot \textbf{u}=0$$

We can apply the second relation to the first to get

$$- \nabla^2 \textbf{P} + \textbf{F} \cdot \nabla \delta(\textbf{x})=0 $$
$$\nabla^2 \textbf{P} = \textbf{F} \cdot \nabla \delta(\textbf{x}) $$

The Greens function for the 3D laplacian, according to Wikipedia, is $$-1 \over{4 \pi r}$$ where $$r=(x^2+y^2+z^2)^{1 \over 2}$$ Generally, with Greens functions

$$u(x)= \int G(x,s) f(s) ds$$

So would we get something like

$$\textbf{P}= {-1\over {4 \pi}} \int {1 \over r} \textbf{F} \cdot \nabla \delta(\textbf{x}) ds$$

I believe you might have to convert $$\delta(\textbf{x})={1\over{4 \pi r^2}}\delta(r)$$ I'm a little confused as to where to go next and how to deal with an integral that might have delta functions in it.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pressure is a scalar quantity; it doesn't need a bold symbol.

The Green's function is used to decompose a non-homogenous linear problem L(u) = f into a superposition of problems L(G_{x_0}) = \delta(x - x_0) from which it follows that u(x) = \int f(x_0) G_{x_0}(x)\,dx_0. If we want the solution for a point source of strength k at x_1, then we get <br /> u(x) = \int k\delta(x_0 - x_1)G_{x_0}(x)\,dx_0 = kG_{x_1}(x) and we are looking for a constant multiple of the Green's function G_{x_1}.

To solve L(G_{x_0}) = \delta(x - x_0), we treat it as a homogenous problem L(G_{x_0}) = 0 subject to appropriate conditions on G_{x_0} and its derivatives.

In this case, we want P and \mathbf{u} to be linear in \mathbf{F} and we want -\nabla P + \mu\nabla^2 \mathbf{u} to be proportional to \nabla^2(1/r) with <br /> \int_{r \leq a} \nabla P - \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{u}\,dV = \mathbf{F}. That leads us to \begin{split}<br /> P &amp;= \frac{1}{4\pi} \frac{\mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{r}}{r^3} = -\frac{1}{4\pi}\mathbf{F} \cdot \nabla\left(\frac1r\right),\\ <br /> \mathbf{u} &amp;= \frac{1}{8\pi\mu}\left(\frac{\mathbf{F}}{r} + \frac{(\mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{r})\mathbf{r}}{r^3}\right) = \frac{1}{8\pi \mu}\left(\frac{\mathbf{F}}{r} - (\mathbf{F} \cdot \mathbf{r}) \nabla\left(\frac1r\right)\right).\end{split}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
828
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
810
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K