Ground-state energies of electron gas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the ground-state energies of an N electron system in a cubic volume, highlighting two boundary condition methods that yield different individual energy levels. Despite these differences, the total ground state energy remains equal when the correct values of n1, n2, and n3 are applied, as the boundary conditions impose different restrictions on these values. A participant notes a missing factor of pi^2 in the expression for energy levels under periodic boundary conditions, which is crucial for accurate calculations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding how boundary conditions affect energy states in quantum systems. Overall, the key takeaway is that while individual energy levels differ, the total energy for N fermions can be the same across different boundary conditions.
tsopa
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I read from a textbook that there are two boundaries conditions that may be used in order to determine the energies of N electron system in a cube of volume V (and side a).
...
(check out the attached file)
...
As you can see in the attached file, the energies got by using the the two boundary condition methods are different.

The textbook however states that these energies are not different but are EQUAL if proper values of n1, n2, n3 are taken. How can that be possible? I just see two different things that cannot be equal here. Please help.

Notice that ni = 1, 2 ,3 , ... in the first boundary condition and
ni = ... -2, -1, -1,0 , 1, 2 ,3 , ... in the second condition.
(i = 1,2,3)
 

Attachments

  • energy_electrons.jpg
    energy_electrons.jpg
    25.7 KB · Views: 564
Physics news on Phys.org
The set of energy levels of the individual states are in fact different for the two different boundary conditions. However, if you put N fermions in the box and calculate the total ground state energy of the system, you will get the same total energy for the two different boundary conditions. This is due to the different restrictions on the values of the n_i's for the different boundary conditions.

(There's a factor of pi^2 missing in your expression for the energy levels for the periodic boundary conditions.)
 
Thanks a lot. I got it.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top