Ground state hydrogen parallel to the double slit experiment?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the parallels between the double slit experiment and the ground state of hydrogen, particularly regarding electron spin. It highlights that while an electron can exist in a superposition of spin states, it does not imply that the electron has zero spin. Instead, the electron is in a state with a zero expectation value for spin, meaning it can be in both spin up and spin down states simultaneously without being observed. The conclusion is that the electron does not have a specific spin eigenvalue but exists in a superposition of states. Overall, the conversation clarifies the nature of quantum states in relation to observation and measurement.
doghouseriley
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In the double slit experiment the electron can go through either slit. As long as it is not observed there is an interference pattern as the two possibilities superimpose. The common conclusion to this is that the electron goes through both slits.

Is there a parallel with the ground state of hydrogen? One electron has two states it can be in - spin up/spin down. Does this mean the wave functions for both situations superimpose and it is in both states at once as long as it is not observed (giving a spin of zero!)

I'm sure the answer to this is an abrupt and sharp 'No' but I was wondering why not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
doghouseriley said:
Does this mean the wave functions for both situations superimpose and it is in both states at once as long as it is not observed?
Yes!
 
tom.stoer said:
Yes!

Oh right! So is it pushing it to say the electron has/can have zero spin?

Answers need not be restricted to the quantum states of 'thumbs up' ('yes') or 'thumbs down' ('no') :biggrin:
 
doghouseriley said:
... the electron has/can have zero spin?
No!

Consider for simplicity a state of the hydrogen atom of the form

|nlms\rangle = |nlm\rangle \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(|s=+1/2\rangle - |s=-1/2\rangle\right)

So the electron does not have zero spin, but it is in a state with zero expectation value. As there is no reason why the electron should have one specific spin eigenvalue, it is in a superposition of both states.

\langle nlms|\hat{S}_z|nlms\rangle = 0
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top