Ground state of Phosphorus Problem

r_tea
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This problem is 1.1b out of "Atomic Physics" by Budker, Kimball, and Demille. There are solutions in the book, but I am confused:

I'm asked to find the ground state configuration of Phosphorus, which is has 3 P-state valence electrons. Following Hund's rule, we want to find a state with largest total spin (S) and largest total angular momentum (L) (I use little l and s to refer to single particle states). So for 3 electrons, picking the largest S state is easy: we get S=3/2 (i.e. |m_s=1/2 \rangle|m_s=1/2 \rangle|m_s=1/2 \rangle).

Since the spin part is chosen to be symmetric, we must construct an antisymmetric spatial wavefunction. We know all electrons are in the P manifold, so our choices of states for each particle are
l_i=1, m_{l_i}=1,0,-1

The authors go on to use a Slater determinant to find a totally anti-symmetric combination of these states for 3 particles, which coincides with the total angular momentum state |L=0, m_L=0\rangle. Great! So then the ground state will be
|S=3/2, m_S= \text{4 possible values}\rangle|L=0, m_L=0\rangle.

But what the authors don't address is the total angular momentum L=2 state, which should also be anti-symmetric (since symmetry alternates between L=3,2,1,0). And also, since L=2>L=0, it should have a lower energy according to Hund's rules, no? That is my confusion.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, I think I solved my own problem. It is true that for two identical spins the total angular momentum states follow the symmetry pattern:
L_\text{total,max} \rightarrow \text {Symmetric}
L_\text{total,max}-1 \rightarrow \text {Antisymmetric}
L_\text{total,max}-2 \rightarrow \text {Symmetric}
\text{etc.}

However, for three particles, I'm pretty sure this statement is not true. For example, in my problem I had the addition of three l=1 particles. I think the states actually look like...
L_\text{tot}=3 \rightarrow \text {Symmetric}
L_\text{tot}=2 \rightarrow \text {No def symmetry}
L_\text{tot}=1 \rightarrow \text {No def symmetry}
L_\text{tot}=0 \rightarrow \text {Antisymmetric}

Hence, only the Ltot=0 case would work for my problem.

Does anyone know any more about this many-particle addition of angular momentum? E.g., maybe the alternating symmetry works for addition of even numbers of identical particles?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top