Group Action on GL(2,R) by Conjugation: Orbit and Isotropy Group of a Matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter Oxymoron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Set
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the action of the group G=GL(2,R) on itself by conjugation, specifically analyzing the orbit and isotropy group of the matrix A = [[2, 1], [0, 3]]. The orbit O_A is derived as O_A = {gA | g ∈ GL(2,R)}, leading to the conclusion that O_A can be expressed in the form [[2a, -2a + 3d], [0, 3d]] for all a, d in R. The isotropy group G_A consists of elements that leave A unchanged, resulting in G_A being the identity matrix, indicating that the isotropy subgroup is trivial. Overall, the analysis confirms the orbit and isotropy group's characteristics for the given matrix A.
Oxymoron
Messages
868
Reaction score
0
Question

Let G=GL(2,\mathbb{R}) be the group of invertible 2\times 2 martrices with real entries. Consider the action of G on itself by conjugation. For the element


A= \left(\begin{array}{cc}<br /> 2 &amp; 1 \\ <br /> 0 &amp; 3<br /> \end{array}\right)

of G, describe (i) the orbit and (ii) the isotropy group of A

Sorry, I have no working out because I am completely stumped. Can anyone give me some helpful hints or pointers. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The orbit is going to be of the form

O_A = \{gA\,|\, g\in GL(2,\mathbb{R})\}

Here g can be found by the following way

gA = Ag where g \in GL(2,\mathbb{R})

\left(\begin{array}{cc}a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}2 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 3\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 3\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}a &amp; b \\ c &amp; d\end{array}\right)

\left(\begin{array}{cc}2a &amp; a+3b \\ 2c &amp; c+3d\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2a+c &amp; 2b+d \\ 3c &amp; 3d\end{array}\right)

Which implies that 2c = 3c = 0 \Leftrightarrow c = 0. Hence

\left(\begin{array}{cc}2a &amp; a+3b \\ 0 &amp; 3d\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2a &amp; 2b+d \\ 0 &amp; 3d\end{array}\right)

And we can write

g = \left(\begin{array}{cc}a &amp; d-a \\ 0 &amp; d\end{array}\right)

Therefore the orbit can be described as

O_A = \{gA\,|\, g\in GL(2,\mathbb{R})\}

So

O_A = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2a &amp; -2a + 3d \\ 0 &amp; 3d\end{array}\right)\quad \forall a,b \in \mathbb{R}

how does this look?
 
Last edited:
The isotropy group is the subgroup of GL(2,\mathbb{R}) consisting of the elements that do not move A. That is

G_A = \{gA = A\,|\,g\in GL(2,\mathbb{R})\}

Therefore we have

\left(\begin{array}{cc}2a &amp; -2a+3d \\ 0 &amp; 3d\end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{cc}2 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 3\end{array}\right)

So a = 1, \, d = 1. Therefore

G_A = \left(\begin{array}{cc}1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1\end{array}\right) = e

the isotropy subgroup consists of the identity element.
 
Last edited:
Anyone know if I have done this correctly? Anyone?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
799
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K