Group Action on Set S: The Induced Homomorphism from g \in S_{5}

  • Thread starter Thread starter Symmetryholic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Set
Symmetryholic
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Let g= \left( \begin{array}{ccccc} <br /> <br /> 1 &amp; 2 &amp; 3 &amp; 4 &amp; 5 \\ <br /> <br /> 2 &amp; 5 &amp; 4 &amp; 1 &amp; 3 \end{array} \right) <br /> <br /> be an element of S_{5} and a set S={1,2,3}.



The theorem of a group action says "If a group G acts on a set, this action induces a homomorphism G->A(S), A(S) is the group of all permutations of the set S."



When I apply the above action g on a set S, 1 \mapsto 2, 2 \mapsto 5, 3 \mapsto 4, which is not a permutation of a set S.

A group action on a set possibly does not induce a set of its own permutation on set S?

Any opinion will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that S5 doesn't act on {1, 2, 3} (with the usual action of permutation groups), since 2 is in X, but g(2) = 5 is not in {1, 2, 3}. A group action of G on a set X must send an element of G and an element of X to an element of X; what you show is a map that does not map into {1, 2, 3}, so it cannot be an action on {1, 2, 3}.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
638
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
463
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top