Group (Associativity of Binary Operators)

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Statement:
One of the key elements in being in what people call group is that elements must be associative.

So this means if we take any three elements from what we propose to be a group, they should be associative,
a*(b*C) = (a*b)*c

Question:
Suppose we do have a group with elements a, b, c.
Would the following be true,
a*(b*C) = (a*b)*c = (c*a)*b
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would be true if and only if c commutes with ab. In that case, you only need associativity in a(bc) = (ab)c = c(ab) = (ca)b.
However, in general that is not true. Probably your favorite non-abelian group provides an easy counterexample.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top