Group Theory - Help in learning

Luris
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm going through a group theory text on my own, as it is not formally covered in my undergrad curriculum. I've had a good (multiple course) background in the basics, differential equations, linear algebra with Hilbert spaces, etc., in my undergrad coursework in my physics major. I'd like to use this thread in asking some questions in group theory, as I'm learning it from the textbook.

Here is my first question:

Prove: If q and p are prime then the cyclic group of order q*p can be factorized into the direct product of cyclic groups of order q and order p

(Symbolically) Prove: Z_{qp} = Z_q \times Z_p

Since this problem was introduced right after they established the representation where any element in the cyclic group can be represented by a power of a = exp(2i\pi/N), where N is the order of the group, I tried expressing Z_n = exp(2i\pi/n) and then verifying the two sides... and I'm not getting an equality. I'm wondering how to prove it?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think the ingredient you're missing is the Chinese remainder theorem. (http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ChineseRemainderTheoremProof.html )

By the way, there is a important subtlety you should be aware of: Z_{qp} = Z_q \times Z_p is not an actual equality - it's an isomorphism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top