Group Theory: Proving Abelian of Order 4 or Less

  • Thread starter Thread starter tuggler
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion centers around proving that any group of order 4 or less is abelian, with participants exploring the properties of group elements and their orders.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of element orders in groups of order 4, questioning why elements must have orders of 2 or 4 and the necessity of at least one element having order 4. There is also a consideration of Lagrange's theorem and its relevance to the orders of elements.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants seeking clarification on definitions and properties related to group orders. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between group order and element order, but no consensus has been reached on the implications for proving abelian properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating definitions and properties of group theory, particularly focusing on the constraints imposed by group order and the orders of its elements.

tuggler
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that any group of order 4 or less is abelian

2. The attempt at a solution

I came across this hint.

Since its of order 4 we have {e,a,b,c}, where e = identity.

The elements a, b, c must have order 2 or 4. There are two possibilities.

1. a, b, c all have order 2.
2. At least one of them, say a, has order 4.Why does the elements a, b, c have order 2 or 4? And why does at least one of them have order 4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Order is the exponent you have to raise them to obtain the identity?
If the group is of order 4 you can suppose that you have at least one element with order of 3 and arrive a contradiction.
 
SqueeSpleen said:
Order is the exponent you have to raise them to obtain the identity?

Are you asking me a question or is that the answer to my question? lol
 
tuggler said:
Why does the elements a, b, c have order 2 or 4? And why does at least one of them have order 4?
The order of elements of the group have to divide the order of the group (Corollary of Lagrange) This does not tell us for sure that a group of order 4 has elements of order 2, only that 2 and 4 are the only possible orders. The element of order 1 is reserved as the identity element.
 
tuggler said:
Are you asking me a question or is that the answer to my question? lol

Sorry, I didn't meant to confuse you, I was asking if the order of an element was the minimum exponent you need to raise it to obtain the identity. In other words, I was assuming that was the property "order" in my answer.
 
Thank you guys!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K