How many ways can 12 people be divided into 3 equal groups?

  • Thread starter Thread starter abeen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grouping
AI Thread Summary
The number of ways to divide 12 people into 3 equal groups is calculated using combinations. The initial calculation of 12C4*8C4*4C4 yields 34,650, but this overcounts the arrangements of the groups. Since the order of the groups does not matter, the result must be divided by 6 (3!), leading to the correct answer of 5,775. This adjustment resolves the confusion regarding the discrepancy between the calculated and textbook answers. Understanding the importance of accounting for group order is crucial in combinatorial problems.
abeen
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The number of ways in which 12 people may be divided into 3 equal groups is_
My ans is 12C4*8C4*4C4=34650.
But my test book contains the answer 5775.
So iam confused. Is my answer correct or am i missing something?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
abeen said:
i missing something?

Just that you are counting all possible orderings of the groups. What I mean is that if you have one particular grouping say { {1 2 3 4} {5 6 7 8} {9 10 11 12} } you are counting that same thing six times over (assuming that the ordering of the groups doesn't matter).

{ {1 2 3 4} {5 6 7 8} {9 10 11 12} }
{ {1 2 3 4} {9 10 11 12} {5 6 7 8} }
{ {5 6 7 8} {1 2 3 4} {9 10 11 12} }
{ {5 6 7 8} {9 10 11 12} {1 2 3 4} }
{ {9 10 11 12} {1 2 3 4} {5 6 7 8} }
{ {9 10 11 12} {5 6 7 8} {1 2 3 4} }

You just need to divide your answer by six (3!) to correct this.
 
Last edited:
Thank you uart.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top