Grouping Molecules: Urea, Thiourea, Ethanol, etc.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on how to categorize various substances, including urea, thiourea, ethanol, and others, into molecular families. Participants debate whether to classify them based on functional groups, such as acids, bases, and alcohols, or by broader categories like proteins, lipids, and amino acids. There is uncertainty about the intended classification criteria, indicating a need for clarification on the assignment. The conversation highlights the complexity of grouping molecules due to their diverse chemical properties. Ultimately, a clear understanding of the classification criteria is essential for accurate grouping.
n.a.s.h
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How would these substances be grouped into families of molecules?

1. Urea
2. Thiourea
3. ethanol
4. ethylene glycol
5. glycerol
6. dextrose
7. saccharose
8. Bi-Distilled Water
9. Triton X-100 ( a detergent)


Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



such as: acids, bases, alcohols…im not sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure they're not asking for family as in, protein, lipid, amino acid, etc etc?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Can I get my intro Bio problems checked?
Replies
1
Views
3K
News Gusher of Lies: The Dangerous Delusions of Energy Independence
3
Replies
133
Views
27K
News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
2
Replies
65
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top