Groups of prime order are cyclic. (without Lagrange?)

TwilightTulip
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I know full well the proof using Lagrange's thm. But is there a direct way to do this without using the fact that the order of an element divides the order of the group?

I was thinking there might be a way to set up an isomorphism directly between G and Z/pZ.

Clearly all non-zero elements of Z/pZ are generators, so sending any non-identity element of G to any equivalence class of 1,...,p-1 should induce an isomorphism... but how to prove it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess not then :biggrin:

I was thinking that since \phi(1)->g \neq e works, there must be a way to construct such an ismorphism that makes it easy to "play" with the properties of a group to get the isom to work out.

I suppose simply showing that \phi(0) = e=g^0,g^1,...,g^{p-1} are all unique would be enough. But this would e hard without using the fact that the order of an elt must divide p, unless of course this is provable without using lagrange?

I;ve come up with a way, but it assumes we know the properties of Z/pZ and a certain property of homomorphisms: that the order of \phi (k) divides the order of k, which is p.
 
i guess you are essentially using lagrange for cyclic groups, which is all you need here.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
577
Back
Top