Guidance in learning Particle Physics

AI Thread Summary
To start self-learning particle physics, a solid foundation in quantum mechanics and abstract algebra is essential. The individual has completed undergraduate courses in quantum mechanics and abstract algebra, and plans to study Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" while concurrently learning Lie Algebra. Recommendations for further reading include key quantum field theory (QFT) textbooks such as Srednicki, Peskin & Schroeder, and Zee, with Srednicki being noted for its accessibility. Understanding contour integration is also advised as it is relevant to QFT. For Lie Algebra, suggested texts include "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" by Howard Georgi and "An Introduction to Gauge Theories and Modern Particle Physics" by Leader & Predazzi. Overall, a structured approach to QFT is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of particle physics.
Fizicks1
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
I want to start self-learning particle physics, and was wondering if any of you can give me some pointers as to what to do in terms of books to read, maths to learn, etc.

Some background: I have taken undergrad level quantum mechanics 1 and 2 (completed Griffiths), and also a course on abstract algebra (basic group theory + intro to rings and fields).

My current plan for the short term: I plan to self-study from Griffiths' "Introduction to Elementary Particles" (heard great things about it), and also concurrently self-study Lie Algebra this summer.

I then plan to move on to slightly more formal books on particle physics (any recommendations?).

Any kind of input is welcomed and much appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your background sounds good. Have you taken an undergraduate electromagnetism course? That will be helpful at some point.

If what you really want to learn is quantum field theory, Griffiths's book gives some flavor of this but doesn't derive everything from first principles and will probably leave you wondering, for example, where the Feynman rules come from. Spending some time with Griffiths is probably a good idea, but only as a way of preparing for "real" QFT.

Then some standard standard QFT textbooks are by Srednicki; Peskin & Schroeder; and Zee. I like Srednicki's book as a thorough introduction which works everything out in the simplest possible QFT before moving on to QED. Peskin & Schroeder is also very thorough but I found it less accessible because it dives directly into QED. Zee is not good as a main book to learn from, but has some useful insights. Having more than one QFT book is a good idea.

Lie algebras are an excellent topic to study alongside QFT.

If you haven't already, you'll want to learn a bit about the technique of solving integrals by contour integration. But it's not too complicated and you can just wait until you run into it in a textbook and then Google will turn up plenty of useful sites that will teach you about it.
 
Thanks The_Duck for the response. I have indeed taken an EM course, in fact I'm finishing the second half of Griffiths this semester in my second undergrad EM course.

Also luckily I do have some experience with contour integration, from a course on mathematical methods in physics I took last year.

Also thanks for the book recommendations. Any recommendations on Lie Algebra books?

Thanks again.

Though I must say, with over a hundred views and only 1 reply, I am quite disappointed.
 
The_Duck recommendations are good, but keep in mind that they have to do with quantum field theory. It is probably indispensable to spend some time learning quantum field theory on its own if you want to study particle physics. I post some recommendations on particle physics.

"Lie Algebras in Particle Physics : from Isospin To Unified Theories"
Howard Georgi
Frontiers in Physics, Westview Press

"An introduction to Gauge Theories and Modern Particle Physics"
Leader & Predazzi
Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology

"Dynamics of the Standard Model"
Donoghue, Golowich & Holstein
CUP

"Gauge Field Theories"
Stefan Pokorski
CUP

Particle Data Group review (2012)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc
Fizicks1 said:
Though I must say, with over a hundred views and only 1 reply, I am quite disappointed.

Sometimes you actually get what you pay for. :wink:
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
71
Views
852
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top