Guitar acting as a helmholtz resonator. Explanation?

AI Thread Summary
A guitar can be analyzed as a Helmholtz resonator due to its ability to amplify sound through its body, which acts as a resonating chamber. The primary sound source is the vibration of the strings, which transfers energy to the soundboard, creating sound waves. While the Helmholtz equation f=c/2π √(S/VL) can be applied, the guitar's sound production mechanism differs from a classic Helmholtz resonator. The discussion emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of how the guitar's structure contributes to its energetic sound. Exploring the relationship between string vibration and soundboard resonance is crucial for a comprehensive analysis.
jackscholar
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a bit of a problem in class. I am attempting to do an assignment on sound in relation to a guitar. For this I need to explain how the guitar is a highly energetic intrument. I do not know if looking at is like a helmholtz resonator is a waste of my time or not but I'm curious. I, firstly, would like to know if this can relate to how energetic the instrument really is and secondly how it does indeed act like a helmholtz resonator.

I have looked on the internet and in books but I have no found a satisfying explanation. A use of the helmholtz equation in relation to my problem would prove highly beneficial. Any help is highly appreciated and furthermore, any suggestions into anything else i should look at would also be highly appreciated.


Homework Equations


f=c/2π √(S/VL)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The main source of sound on an acoustic guitar is the sound board, which is driven by the vibration of the strings at the bridge on the soundboard. I don't think this would qualify as being a helmholtz resonator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top