Guitar feedback INFINITE sustain? Does it really have an infinite sustain?

AI Thread Summary
Guitar sustain can be extended indefinitely through devices like the EBow, Fernandes Sustainer, and Sustainiac, but true infinite sustain is not achievable due to physical limitations. The sound produced by these devices is synthesized and may degrade over time, even if the power source remains stable. When a guitar is played near loud speakers, the feedback can initially increase volume but will ultimately be limited by the amplifier's capabilities. Maintaining constant feedback for true infinite sustain is complex and requires careful gain control, as the system is inherently self-limiting. Ultimately, while techniques like circular breathing can extend sound in vocal performance, they cannot achieve true infinite sustain like some electronic devices claim.
Munyit
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Now we can get many devices that can make guitar sustain longer, even sustaining it indefinitely or to be more precise, sustaining forever. For example, the EBow,(http://www.ebow.com/home.php) the Fernandes Sustainer and the Sustainiac. But I believe, even when the battery power will not getting low, the sustain will decay from times to times but without we noticing it. What's the physics behind this? Does it really sustain the sound forever?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The feedback is synthesized (except in the case that the speaker is close enough and loud enough to drive the guitar strings). Imagine that it's a synthesizer that samples the original sound, then loops outputing the sampled sound indefinately. It may deliberately degrade the sound to some simple harmonic wave form, but the volume will be sustained indefinately. It would be like holding down a key on a synthesizer, the sound level will not fade unless it's programmed to fade.
 
How about in the case if we played a guitar closed enough in front of a very loud speakers to drive the string infinitely? Does it sustain forever?
 
No. Somebody would shoot the guitarist and pull the plug. This result was derived in the late 70's.
 
DrewD said:
No. Somebody would shoot the guitarist and pull the plug. This result was derived in the late 70's.

Wow, you're incredible.
 
Munyit said:
How about in the case if we played a guitar closed enough in front of a very loud speakers to drive the string infinitely?
Unless there's a volume limiter feedback circuit in the amp, the volume will initially increase until it reaches the max that the amplifier can output and you end up with overdriven harmonics of the amplifier circuitry instead of the original guitar sound. This is what happened with those old amps. The "feedback effect" on a synthesizer can reproduce a similar sound but at any volume.
 
rcgldr said:
The feedback is synthesized (except in the case that the speaker is close enough and loud enough to drive the guitar strings). Imagine that it's a synthesizer that samples the original sound, then loops outputing the sampled sound indefinately. It may deliberately degrade the sound to some simple harmonic wave form, but the volume will be sustained indefinately. It would be like holding down a key on a synthesizer, the sound level will not fade unless it's programmed to fade.

Hmm, so can an infinite energy exist?
 
Munyit said:
So can an infinite energy exist?
No, the amplifier get's it's energy from an electrical outlet, which gets it's power from some generating station probably hundreds of kilometers away.
 
To maintain the amount of feedback so that the sustain is constant (without building up and going unstable or dying down) is 'knife edge' and not achievable without a trick.
This trick involves applying some (long term) feedback control to maintain the sound level by controlling the gain carefully. You could do it with the gain knob if you really wanted to for a short while but it would get out of hand.
 
  • #10
Can a human, esp. a very talented singer, etc. sustain his/her vocal indefinitely? (Maybe with a technique?)
 
  • #11
Munyit said:
Can a human, esp. a very talented singer, etc. sustain his/her vocal indefinitely? (Maybe with a technique?)

Make a hole in the chest and pump in air?
 
  • #12
'Circular breathing' can be used to sustain a note on some wind instruments and the bagpipes achieve a sustain with the bag that it topped up with breath or bellows.
 
  • #13
sophiecentaur said:
'Circular breathing' can be used to sustain a note on some wind instruments and the bagpipes achieve a sustain with the bag that it topped up with breath or bellows.


Can we used 'circular breathing' technique for our vocal?
 
  • #14
Try it.
I think your vocal chords require air to be moving outwards past them - which rather conflicts with breathing in.
I can whistle both ways, though, so it's almost sustained.
 
  • #15
Munyit said:
Can a human, esp. a very talented singer, etc. sustain his/her vocal indefinitely?
Not with his/her own voice, but there are these amplifiers and/or synthesizers that output sound through a tube where the other end is directed at the open mouth of the singer, who can then just mouth words (or just make different sounds). I haven't seen this done in a while since microphones can be fed into a synthesizer to get a similar, but not quite as good or versatile effect. Howeve with the sound tube setup, breathing doesn't affect the sound (at least not noticably). An example old song using this device was Peter Frampton's - do you feel like we do - a bit past the half point of the live version song (plenty of youtube versions of this). In this case, a guitar amp fed the sound tube. Funk bands did this also.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
sophiecentaur said:
To maintain the amount of feedback so that the sustain is constant (without building up and going unstable or dying down) is 'knife edge' and not achievable without a trick.
This trick involves applying some (long term) feedback control to maintain the sound level by controlling the gain carefully. You could do it with the gain knob if you really wanted to for a short while but it would get out of hand.


Guitar feedback is self-limiting. The excursion of the string is limited. The sound reaches a maximum and stays there until someone shuts it off.
 
  • #17
ImaLooser said:
Guitar feedback is self-limiting. The excursion of the string is limited. The sound reaches a maximum and stays there until someone shuts it off.

Makes sense. This must be because, somewhere in that feedback loop, the gain limits. That could be due to the Pickup / String interaction, which is pretty non-linear aamof.
 
  • #18
sophiecentaur said:
Makes sense. This must be because, somewhere in that feedback loop, the gain limits. That could be due to the Pickup / String interaction, which is pretty non-linear aamof.

Oh I see, then after sometime the so-called infinite sustain will be started decaying. Right?
 
  • #19
I don't think that follows. If gain increases slightly as level falls, the sustain should continue.
 
Back
Top