Gun sound -- frequency analysis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency analysis of gun sounds, specifically comparing the frequency spectra of small caliber guns (like a 9MM) to larger caliber guns. Participants explore the relationship between caliber size and frequency magnitude, as well as the methods of analyzing sound data using software tools.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant claims that small caliber guns have higher magnitudes at higher frequencies, while larger caliber guns have higher magnitudes at lower frequencies, but questions this based on their own FFT results showing higher magnitudes at higher frequencies for a 9MM gun.
  • Another participant suggests using RMS integration to compare total energy at low and high frequencies across different gun types.
  • There is uncertainty about the definition of low and high frequencies, with one participant questioning whether 804 Hz should be considered low frequency.
  • Participants discuss the differences between linear and logarithmic frequency plots, with one noting that dB is a logarithmic scale and suggesting that both axes should be scaled similarly for better data representation.
  • One participant emphasizes that factors like microphone position and projectile exit velocity influence the sound spectrum more than the bore of the gun itself.
  • Concerns are raised about the effects of echoes and distance from the microphone on frequency analysis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between caliber size and frequency magnitude, with no consensus reached. There is also uncertainty regarding the interpretation of frequency ranges and the effectiveness of different analysis methods.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of frequency definitions, the effectiveness of different software tools for analysis, and the influence of external factors like microphone placement and environmental echoes on sound measurements.

btb4198
Messages
570
Reaction score
10
Small caliber guns have higher magnitude at higher frequencies and larger caliber guns have higher
magnitude at lower frequencies. is this true ? because I am not see this in my test:

upload_2017-1-1_13-41-32.png


that is the fft of a 9MM gun,
As one can see there are low magnitudes at low frequencies and higher magnitudes at higher frequencies.
Also the peck frequencies are around 807 Hz. A 9MM handgun is a Small caliber gun.

upload_2017-1-1_13-55-44.png


that is an fft of a larger caliber gun and the magnitudes are higher at high frequencies ...
am I missing something ?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-1-1_13-46-6.png
    upload_2017-1-1_13-46-6.png
    26.7 KB · Views: 2,026
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you set you software to RMS and then integrate on both sides of what you might call "low frequency"? That will get you the total energy at "high" and "low" frequencies. You can compare these pairs for different types of guns.

Scale all of them so one side is 1. The other number will give the answer you seek.

BoB
 
I am using audacity, but I am not sure what you mean by RMS

also is 804 not a low frequency ?
 
The spectrum can be scaled as dB which is a relative measure and also as RMS (yes Root Mean Square) which is an absolute value. There should be a setting somewhere in your software. You may need a different plugin.

As to 804Hz being low or high frequency that depends on what you are doing. My human perception would put it at middle or high frequency. (YouTube 804Hz for a sample)

BoB
 
ok there is this :
upload_2017-1-1_14-42-16.png


this is Linear frequency .
so what are the different between plotting it as Linear frequency vs Log frequency ?
 
this is the 9MM one again :
upload_2017-1-1_14-50-19.png


but with Linear frequency
it looks the same as the other one
 
dB is a logarithmic scale so plotting both axes at the same scaling gives a better representation of the data. I don't know of the use of plotting X at a linear scale and Y and a logarithmic scale.

BoB
 
ok but do you know why it is not working ?
do you know another program I should try ?
 
  • #10
Your program is working just fine. There is probably a way of analyzing the data as dB to get the answer you want. I just select the parameters I need on my oscilloscope and use the cursors for the frequency range needed. I am not familiar with using PC software for this work.

I'm afraid that is about all I know about this subject. Hopefully someone with more knowledge will come along to help further.

BoB
 
  • #11
It is not the bore of the gun that decides the spectrum. It is the position of the microphone and the exit velocity of the projectile.

Supersonic ammunition will generate a shockwave that is a step function with relatively little low frequency energy. Lower velocity ammunition, or a muzzle brake, will generate a broad low frequency spectrum typical of a trapezoidal waveform.

High frequencies are steeply attenuated in air. The distance to the microphone will be critical.

Any echo will generate a frequency dependent interference pattern. How do you eliminate echoes from the microphone. Do not forget echoes from the ground.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn and sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K