Inflation and GUTs: Energy Scales & Model Dependence

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inflation
Jim
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Can someone please clarify if the energy scales of Inflation & GUTs are identical,
or model-dependent ? One typically sees ~10^15 Gev to 2x10^16 Gev in the literature,
which is a small variance, but its not clear if there are `standard values'.

I am also curious if one can have inflation without GUTs ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The scales of inflation and GUTs are independent, so yes, one can have inflation without GUTs. And on the flip side, GUTs don't automatically incorporate inflation. The usually quoted characteristic energy scale of inflation 10^15-10^16 Gev is based on observation. Unlike inflation, GUTs are hypothetical, and the energy scales associated with them are model-dependent. It just so happens that "standard" field theory GUTs require a scale of 10^16 Gev. But there are certainly GUTs, e.g. in theories with at least one extra dimension, in which the characteristic scale is of a different order of magnitude.
 
Keep in mind, historically, inflation was partially invented to rescue GUT theories in cosmology. GUT theories are amongst the most widely held beliefs (that we can't prove) in the HEP community. They're almost taken for granted.

The problem is many typical models incorporate a preponderous of particles like magnetic monopoles and other various topological defects. Roughly, they should be everywhere, b/c the big bang would copiously produce them and that is flagrantly in violation of observation.

Enter an inflationary epoch somewhere around the GUT scale (typically a little bit higher energy), which dilutes the abundance to observational limits.
 
Jim said:
I am also curious if one can have inflation without GUTs ?

Just a thought, particles are created near horizons, e.g. black holes. But acceleration also creates horizons, i.e. Unruh effect. So if space is expanding exponentially (inflation), then every point in space becomes an horizon due to acceleration. So perhaps it is that inflation is what is responsible for the original particles to begin with, and therefore connected in some way to GUT's
 
Last edited:
Thanx all for your quik responses !

Haelfix: Agree about the historical correlation. Running with the mSSM value of 2E16 Gev
for the GUT group to split into SU(3) and SU(2)xU(1), this occurs considerably prior to reheating at ~ 2E15 Gev, when FRW evolution kicks in again. The time scales are approx.,
Trh ~ 100Tgut. Clearly, there is a temporal sequence of events here.

In terms of chicken v. egg, accd'g to Guth, inflation began ~ 10^-37 sec. mSSM GUT energy corresponds to a time scale of about 10^-39 sec, which strongly suggests a causal relation, with the GUT symmetry breaking causing the phase transition driving inflation.
Indeed, it seems more aesthetic to have the GUT symmetry breaking initiate inflation, since GUTs correspond to ~ 100-1000 Planck lengths, whereas inflation ranges up into the macroscopic domain ~ centimeters.
 
This is an alert about a claim regarding the standard model, that got a burst of attention in the past two weeks. The original paper came out last year: "The electroweak η_W meson" by Gia Dvali, Archil Kobakhidze, Otari Sakhelashvili (2024) The recent follow-up and other responses are "η_W-meson from topological properties of the electroweak vacuum" by Dvali et al "Hiding in Plain Sight, the electroweak η_W" by Giacomo Cacciapaglia, Francesco Sannino, Jessica Turner "Astrophysical...
Hello everyone, I am seeking to better understand the conceptual foundations and potential consequences of "Two-Time Physics" (2T-physics), as developed by Itzhak Bars and others. My interest was sparked by a recent paper that attempts to explain anomalous results in particle physics (apparent superluminal propagation of virtual photons) within the framework of 2T-physics: Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02696 Key quote from the abstract: *"...the problem... can be solved naturally...
Back
Top