Why is a transfer function denoted by 'H'?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the historical and contextual reasoning behind the notation of the transfer function as 'H' in control theory and system design. Participants explore various hypotheses regarding the choice of this letter, including its relationship to other symbols and potential historical conventions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that 'H(s)' is the Laplace transform of the impulse response 'h(t)', questioning the origin of the letter 'h'.
  • Another participant suggests a possible connection to Hilbert Transforms as a reason for using 'H'.
  • One participant speculates that 'H' was chosen to avoid ambiguity with other common symbols like 'F' and 'G', as it is the next letter in the alphabet without significant meaning.
  • Another participant humorously proposes that a simple electronic circuit filter resembles an 'H' on its side, contributing to the notation choice.
  • A later reply expresses a desire for more information on the reasoning behind the use of 'H', indicating that the F-G-H sequence might be a mundane explanation.
  • One participant shares a related curiosity about the use of 'U' for voltage instead of 'V', highlighting the distinction between the unit and the quantity.
  • Another participant points out that using 'T' for transfer functions could lead to confusion with time-dependent functions, as both 'H(t)' and 'h(t)' exist.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitive reason for the use of 'H' in transfer functions, with multiple competing hypotheses presented and no clear resolution to the question.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about historical notation choices and the potential for ambiguity in symbol usage, but these remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in control theory, system design, or the historical context of mathematical notation may find this discussion relevant.

Gonzo17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
During a basic lecture about system design the transfer function H(s) was discussed. The question was raised why the letter 'H' is used for this...

Sounds weird, but I did start to think about it... Indeed in many books and publications the letter H (besides sometimes G(ain)) is used to describe the transfer function.

I googled around but I didn't come further than the fact that H(s) is the Laplace transform of the impulse response, denoted by h(t). Lovely explanation, but of course it moves the problem to where 'h' comes from in the impulse response...

Maybe I am looking over something extremely trivial, but I can't seem to get around it. Anybody any idea what the (historical) reason for this mysterious 'H' is?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Might have something to do with Hilbert Transforms.
 
Just a wild guess.

The transform tables are typically based on F and G.
H is the next letter in the alphabet that has no other significant meaning.
So I suspect H was chosen to avoid ambiguity with F and G (and other symbols).

An alternative interpretation is that a typical simple electronic circuit filter looks like an H on its side.
 
That's probably right ^
Just a whimsical notation that stuck
 
Thanks for the suggestions...

It is possible that it's just the boring F-G-H-thing mentioned above. But if anybody knows of another story, I'll be more than happy to hear it! :-)
 
Once upon a time I googled why U is sometimes used for voltage instead of V.
The only thing I could find, is to distinguish the unit volt from the quantity voltage.
I'd still be interested in a better explanation. ;)
 
Also T wouldn't work because transfer functions are often functions of time, you can have H(t), and h(t), but it's confusing to have T(t) and t(t)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
34K