Habitable exoplanets of white dwarfs

  • Thread starter Thread starter FtlIsAwesome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exoplanets
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for habitable exoplanets around white dwarfs, referencing a recent arXiv paper that proposes transit surveys to detect such planets. These planets would likely be tidally locked, possess H/He atmospheres, and could be larger than their parent stars. The habitable zone for white dwarfs is defined, extending from approximately 0.005 to 0.02 AU, with a significant detection advantage due to their size and the nature of their light curves. The conversation also explores the implications of a planet's formation and migration in relation to the white dwarf's cooling and habitable window, which can last several billion years. Overall, the potential for discovering habitable planets around white dwarfs presents an intriguing avenue for future astronomical research.
FtlIsAwesome
Gold Member
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
A while back a new arxiv paper was published.
"Transit surveys for Earths in the habitable zones of white dwarfs"
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1103/1103.2791v2.pdf
I finally got around to fully reading it, but I'll probably have to reread it to make it stick in my memory.

What would the properties of such a planet be? It would be tidally locked and have an H/He atmosphere, what else?

A cool thing is that the planet can be larger in radius than the parent white dwarf. A planet bigger than its sun.

The most appealing factor is that these would be easier to detect than around main sequence stars.

Have we currently detected any planets of white dwarfs?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I'd guess that the properties of a planet around a white dwarf are nearly endless. I'm sure it all depends on the way the system was formed and such.
 
If it is in the habitable zone of the white dwarf, wouldn't it be inside the diameter of the precursor red-giant ??
 
Nik_2213 said:
If it is in the habitable zone of the white dwarf, wouldn't it be inside the diameter of the precursor red-giant ??

Probably. But with the differences in stars and the possibilities of planets forming from the lost matter of the red giant, I'd say its probably possible for there to be a habitable planet there. Unlikely is my guess, but probably possible.
 
From Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=habitable-exoplanets-could-exist-at-2011-04-01

Transit Surveys for Earths in the Habitable Zones of White Dwarfs
To date the search for habitable Earth-like planets has primarily focused on nuclear burning stars. I propose that this search should be expanded to cool white dwarf stars that have expended their nuclear fuel. I define the continuously habitable zone of white dwarfs and show that it extends from ≈0.005 to 0.02 AU for white dwarfs with masses from 0.4 to 0.9 M sun, temperatures less than ≈10^4 K, and habitable durations of at least 3 Gyr. As they are similar in size to Earth, white dwarfs may be deeply eclipsed by terrestrial planets that orbit edge-on, which can easily be detected with ground-based telescopes. If planets can migrate inward or reform near white dwarfs, I show that a global robotic telescope network could carry out a transit survey of nearby white dwarfs placing interesting constraints on the presence of habitable Earths. If planets were detected, I show that the survey would favor detection of planets similar to Earth: similar size, temperature, and rotation period, and host star temperatures similar to the Sun. The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope could place even tighter constraints on the frequency of habitable Earths around white dwarfs. The confirmation and characterization of these planets might be carried out with large ground and space telescopes.
But even a white dwarf that formed over 10 billion years ago would have a relatively short "habitable window" at the present time, only a few billion years. Though a white dwarf is essentially condensed, not changing its size significantly as it cools, it can cool by a sizable amount over the age of the Universe. From http://astro1.panet.utoledo.edu/~gthomps/Presentations/Fall07ABL9.25.pdf , an approximate equation for a white dwarf's luminosity is

(L/Lsun) = 8.4*10-4 * (M/Msun) * (time/(1 Gyr))-7/5
1 Gyr = 109 years.

So a WD's planet's temperature would vary as power -7/20 of the time since it became a WD.

Let's see how some familiar white dwarfs stack up
Which | Age | Mass(S) | Rad(S) | Lum(S) | Temp | a(AU) | Per(d) | Hab. window
Sirius B | 0.2 Gyr | 0.978 | 0.0084 | 0.026 | 25200 K | 0.16 | 24 | 0.12 Gyr
Procyon B | 3 Gyr | 0.602 | 0.01234 | 0.00055 | 7740 K | 0.023 | 1.7 | 1.8 Gyr

The habitability window is the amount of time where the planet's surface temperature goes from 1.1 * Earth's to 0.9 * Earth's, and is about 0.6 * current age. The oldest white dwarfs are around 10 billion years old, giving them a present-time habitability window of 6 billion years, close to the Earth's. A habitable planet would orbit at around 0.01 AU, with a period of about half a day.

A habitable planet of a white dwarf would get tidally locked, so one side always faces its star, like the Moon with the Earth.

There is an interesting historical parallel. In the late 19th cy., various scientists had proposed that the Sun is slowly cooling down, making the Earth's surface also slowly cool down. This is what would happen to a planet of a white dwarf.

There's also the question of whether a planet could form that close to a white dwarf, or if it formed elsewhere, how it could get that close.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
lpetrich said:
From Scientific American: http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=habitable-exoplanets-could-exist-at-2011-04-01

Transit Surveys for Earths in the Habitable Zones of White Dwarfs
That's where I first saw it. On the PF main page was link to the SciAm article. The IOP paper requires payment; while browsing qraal's blog I found a link to the arxiv copy. It didn't occur to me to search for it on arxiv. :rolleyes:

The author of the paper skips over the question of the origin of the planet, and discusses the detectability and potential habitability.

Being tidally locked, such a planet will have similarities to the planets thought to exist around M class red dwarfs. The habitable part of the planet will be along the terminator, while the light side and dark side will be overheated and underheated respectively; a nightside icecap and a dayside desert.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top