Half-silvered rear surface phase shift

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phase shift behavior of half-silvered mirrors, specifically comparing dielectric and metallized mirrors. It is noted that while dielectric mirrors do not induce a phase shift upon reflection, metallized mirrors may exhibit a phase shift of 180 degrees, depending on the level of metallization. The speaker proposes that the amplitudes of transmitted and reflected waves must be equal, leading to specific phase shifts to satisfy boundary conditions. However, confusion arises regarding the differing behaviors of front surface and dielectric rear surface mirrors, despite similar expectations. The inquiry highlights a need for clarification on the phase shift differences in various mirror types.
Alfred Cann
Messages
82
Reaction score
4
I have read that the rear surface reflection of a half-silvered mirror undergoes no phase shift. But they caution that this is true only for a dielectric mirror. What is the answer for a metallized mirror? It seems to me that the answer must either be 180 degr., or pass continuously to 180 degr. as we increase the metallization to 100%.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I can partly answer my own question.
The amplitudes of the transmitted and reflected waves must both be 1/√2. To satisfy the boundary conditions, their phase shifts must be + and - π/4, so that they add up to match the input wave, 1.0 at zero phase.
Thus, the mirror acts like a 90° hybrid junction, a device well-known in the microwave world.

I would be comfortable with this explanation except for one thing. I can't see how the answer would be any different for a front surface mirror and a dielectric rear surface mirror, yet the literature sez it is. What am I doing wrong?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top