Exploring Reflection Shifts in Beam Splitters

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter naima
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirrors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phase shifts associated with reflections in beam splitters, specifically addressing the lack of phase shift during rear surface reflections due to the lower refractive index of air compared to glass. It highlights the significance of the metal layer between the glass and air, which introduces complexities in phase shifts when the metal thickness varies. The conversation references the Jones matrix, noting that rotating the front surface by 180° results in an unchanged matrix, indicating that the phase shift differs between front and rear reflections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical physics, specifically reflection and refraction principles.
  • Familiarity with beam splitter design and functionality.
  • Knowledge of Jones matrix formalism in optics.
  • Basic concepts of refractive indices and their impact on light behavior.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of metal thickness on phase shifts in beam splitters.
  • Study the application of Jones matrices in optical systems.
  • Explore the differences in reflection shifts between various optical materials.
  • Investigate advanced topics in optical interference and its relation to beam splitter design.
USEFUL FOR

Optical physicists, engineers designing optical systems, and students studying advanced optics will benefit from this discussion.

naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
I read this

No phase shift accompanies a rear surface reflection, since the medium behind the mirror (air) has a lower refractive index than the medium the light is traveling in (glass).

They do not talk about the metal between glass and air! Reflection occurs between glass (low index) and metal (high index)in the beam splitter. What about phase when metal is thick?
 
Science news on Phys.org
For more detail see: http://relativity.livingreviews.org/open?pubNo=lrr-2010-1&page=articlesu9.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good link
look at Jones matrix
if we rotate the front surface by 180° it becomes a rear surface.
We have R(180) = R(-180) = -I
So the Jones matrix should remain unchanged.
Why is there a difference between the front reflection shift and the rear reflection shift?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
10K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K