Halliday Or Feynman Lectures Or Young and Freedman?

AI Thread Summary
When considering which physics book to choose for strengthening foundational knowledge, the discussion highlights three options, with a particular focus on "RH" and "YF." The Feynman Lectures are noted for their accessibility and enjoyment but lack problem sets for knowledge testing. Participants suggest that "RH" is the most beneficial for improving physics understanding and technique, especially for those with a basic grasp of mechanics and thermodynamics. The consensus leans towards using "RH" for serious study while recommending the Feynman Lectures for supplementary enjoyment.
Yashbhatt
Messages
348
Reaction score
13
I am aware that all three of them are good ones. But, if one is to be picked, which one would it be? I have basic knowledge of mechanics and a little of thermodynamics. I am looking for a book which will further strengthen my basics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice. But I was asking which of the three would be better?
 
I am most familiar with RH. I taught 4 semesters with RH in the early 1980's. I am not as familiar with YF. Feynman does not have any problems to test your knowledge.
I think your best bet for improving your physics knowledge and technique is RH. Read Feynman for fun
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top