Eigenstates, Eigenvalues & Multicplity of Hamiltonian w/ Spin 1/2

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hamiltonian Spin
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
> Consider two particle with spin 1/2 interacting via the hamiltonian $H
= \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2}$, Where A is a constant. What aare the eigenstates, eigenvalues and its multicplity?

$H = \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2} = A\frac{(SS-S_{1}S_{1}-S_{2}S_{2})}{2\hbar^2 } = A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }$

Now, $S_{1}²$, for example, has the same eigenvectors as S1z, that is, $11,10,1-1,00$
And all these states are eigenvectors of S², so we have:

$$H|11\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|11\rangle = A\frac{(2 \hbar^2- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|11\rangle = \frac{A}{4}|11\rangle$$

$$H|10\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|10\rangle = A\frac{(2 \hbar^2- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|10\rangle = \frac{A}{4}|10\rangle$$

$$H|1-1\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|1-1\rangle = A\frac{(2 \hbar^2- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|1-1\rangle = \frac{A}{4}|1-1\rangle$$

$$H|00\rangle= A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }|00\rangle = A\frac{(- 3 \hbar^2/4 -3 \hbar^2/4 )}{2\hbar^2 }|00\rangle = \frac{-3A}{4}|00\rangle$$

I want to know i this is right. Is it? To be honest, i think it is, but what worries me is that i am not sure i these are all the eigenvalues/eigenvectors. I believe H would be something like a "4x4" matrix, so i think it is. But want to hear your answer too.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work looks correct to me.

For inline Latex, use double hashtag rather than single dollar sign.
 
Just making it easier to read> Consider two particle with spin 1/2 interacting via the hamiltonian $$H
= \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2}$$, Where A is a constant. What aare the eigenstates, eigenvalues and its multicplity?

$$H = \frac{A}{\hbar^2}S_{1}.S_{2} = A\frac{(SS-S_{1}S_{1}-S_{2}S_{2})}{2\hbar^2 } = A\frac{(S^2-S_{1}^2-S_{2}^2)}{2\hbar^2 }$$

Now, $$S_{1}²$$, for example, has the same eigenvectors as S1z, that is, $$11,10,1-1,00$$
And all these states are eigenvectors of S², so we have:
 
Herculi said:
I want to know i this is right. Is it? To be honest, i think it is, but what worries me is that i am not sure i these are all the eigenvalues/eigenvectors. I believe H would be something like a "4x4" matrix, so i think it is. But want to hear your answer too.
The Hamiltonian is indeed a 4×4 matrix. You have found 4 eigenvalues, so what's your concern? A quick test on your eigenvalues to check whether if the Hamiltonian matrix is traceless (the sum of diagonal elements is zero), the sum of the eigenvalues must be zero. That is true in this case which does not guarantee the correctness of your eigenvalues but at least they pass this test so there is no error in the arithmetic.
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top