Hamiltonian-momentum commutator

  • Thread starter Thread starter jarvinen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
jarvinen
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I have a potential of -1/r and I need to compute \left[H , \ \mathbf{p} \right].

I got the result of i \hbar \left( \frac{1}{r^{2}}, \ 0 , \ 0 \right).

Am I wrong about this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post your method of computing the commutator ?
 
Just used that \mathbf{p} = -i \hbar \nabla and H = \frac{- \hbar ^{2}}{2m} \nabla ^{2} + U

Hence H \mathbf{p} \psi - \mathbf{p} H \psi can be written but note that the \mathbf{p} \dot \mathbf{p} part of H will commute with \mathbf{p}, hence only consider U \mathbf{p} \psi - \mathbf{p} U \psi = \left( -i \hbar \right) \left( - \psi \nabla U \right) then substitute for the given U.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top