Hang vertically downward are connected by a pulley

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenPrivitera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by gravity on two masses connected by a pulley system, where one mass is heavier than the other. The initial approach incorrectly assumed that the tension in the rope equals the weight of the lighter mass, which is a critical error since the lighter mass is accelerating upwards. The correct method involves applying Newton's second law to both masses to derive the correct expressions for tension and acceleration. The participant initially calculated the work done on the heavier mass, concluding it to be 6300J, but this was inconsistent with the book's answer of 1.8x10^3J. The confusion stemmed from misapplying the relationship between tension and gravitational force. The discussion emphasizes the need to derive the tension for each mass separately and equate them to find the correct acceleration, which ultimately affects the work done by gravity on each mass.
StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
Find the work done by gravity when two masses (42kg and 75kg) which hang vertically downward are connected by a pulley. The masses are initially at rest. The mass move under the influence of gravity for 2.0s. Assume no friction in the pulley.

My solution:
Considering the larger mass m1, the work done by gravity on m1 is
W1=w1*d, where W1 is the work done on m1 by gravity, w1 is the force of gravity acting on m1, and d is the distance traversed by m1 in the time period. d is the same for both m1 and m2 (the smaller mass) since both move under the influence of gravity and therefore have the same acceleration. The net force on m1 is the force of gravity on m1 minus the tension of the rope (if downward is to be the positive direction). The tension of the rope is equivalent in magnitude to the weight of m2. Thus, F(net)1=g*(m1-m2)=m1*a. This distance traversed by m1 is then d=g/(2m1)*(m1-m2)(t^2). The work done by gravity on m1 is then
W1=g*m1*g/(2m1)*(m1-m2)(t^2)=(g^2)/2*(m1-m2)(t^2)=6300J
Without calculating, I can see that the work done by gravity on the other mass should be equivalent in magnitude to this answer.

Book's answer: 1.8x10^3J

Where did I go wrong?
Thanks in advance for the help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension of the rope is equivalent in magnitude to the weight of m2.
This is obviously wrong, as m2 is accelerating upwards, showing a net resultant force on m2 of m2*a.

Try instead to work out an expression for T for each mass, and equate the Ts to get the acceleration.
 


Hi Stephen, and welcome to PF.

Originally posted by StephenPrivitera
My solution:
Considering the larger mass m1, the work done by gravity on m1 is
W1=w1*d, where W1 is the work done on m1 by gravity, w1 is the force of gravity acting on m1, and d is the distance traversed by m1 in the time period. d is the same for both m1 and m2 (the smaller mass) since both move under the influence of gravity and therefore have the same acceleration. The net force on m1 is the force of gravity on m1 minus the tension of the rope (if downward is to be the positive direction).

OK

The tension of the rope is equivalent in magnitude to the weight of m2.

This is a mistake. Remember that m2 is accelerating[/color], so Newton's 2nd law for m2 reads is:

ΣFy=T-m2g=m2a2.

T does not equal m2g!

Try implementing that correction into your solution and see what you come up with.
 
Thanks for the help. To show you I learned my lesson, I performed this little exercise. Please check my work.
I figured that the problem above was just a specific instance of the general case below (where A1=A2=pi/2). Both masses are on frictionless surfaces. They are attached by a rope which runs along a frictionless pulley. See the attached diagram. I'll show my work briefly (since I'm sure you know much more than I do, this should be very easy to follow).
I figured out that the problem becomes very simple if I treat the rope as if it were straight (and rotate the other forces accordingly). Then I don't have to worry about vector notation using two different coordinate systems. Anyway,
T - m1*g*sin(A1) = m1*a
a = (1/m1)(T-m1*g*sin(A1)) = (1/m2)(m2*g*sin(A2) - T)
T = (m1*m2*g)/(m1 + m2)*(sin(A1) + sin(A2))
When A1=A2=pi/2
T = 2(m1*m2*g)/(m1 + m2)
Thanks again!

...
I was so confident in this result, but it doesn't appear to be right either. Using my work above, I'm still getting 2400J for the work on the smaller mass in the original problem. What am I doing wrong?
W=FgD=m2*g*1/2*(Fnet)/m2*t^2 = g/2*t^2*Fnet
For Fnet I have Fnet = T - m2*g = 2(m1*m2*g)/(m1 + m2) - m2*g
W = 1/2*(tg)^2*m2*[2m1/(m1+m2)-1]
From there it's just plugging in numbers. Where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top