Hard? implicit differentiation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster is tasked with finding the second derivative, d²y/dx², in terms of x and y from the implicit equation x²y² - 2x = 3. The discussion revolves around implicit differentiation and the simplification of derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods of differentiation, including attempts to simplify the first derivative. The original poster expresses a desire for a more efficient approach, while others offer insights into their own simplifications and the potential for errors in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on simplifications and confirmed the correctness of derivatives. There is an ongoing exploration of different methods and interpretations of the problem, with no explicit consensus reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the differentiation process and the potential for mistakes in calculations. The original poster mentions gaps in their math skills, which may influence their approach to the problem.

rook_b

Homework Statement



Find d^2y/dx^2 in terms of x and y.
[tex]x^2y^2-2x=3[/tex]


Homework Equations



property rule, chain rule, quotient rule,

The Attempt at a Solution



I can do this the long way, but there must be a shorter solution. Can I simplify it? I've found [tex]dy/dx=(-xy^2 +2x)/(2x^2y)[/tex]. but the derivative of that takes a ridiculous amount of steps. If there isn't a shorter way then I'll just take my time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this is how i would simplify

[tex](xy)^{2}-2x=3[/tex]

there aren't that many steps, it only took me 3 steps, maybe you're doing something wrong, if you want show your steps and i'll be happy to help further.
 
OK thanks, that simplification made the first derivative easier and pointed out to me that my original calculation had a mistake. My math skills have quite a few holes. So now I have [tex]dy/dx= (-xy^2+1)/(x^2y)[/tex] so is there another simplification I'm overlooking? If I differentiate that it's still a bit messy and I'm learning there is always an easier way... well sometimes.
 
Your answer for dy/dx in post #3 is correct. I'm not sure how you want to simplify this. You could write [tex]\frac{1-xy^2}{x^2y}=\frac{1}{x^2y}-\frac{y}{x}[/tex] but I'm not sure that this is simpler to differentiate.
 
I'm wondering what "long way" you used. Straight forward implicit differentiation does seem that long to me!

[tex]x^2y^2- 2x= 3[/tex]
Differentiating once:
[tex]2xy^2+ 2x^2yy'- 2= 0[/tex]
Differenitiating again:
[tex]2y^2+ 4xyy'+ 4xyy'+ 2x^2(y')^2+ 2x^2yy"= 0[/tex]
[tex]-2x^2yy"= 2y^2+ 8xyy'+ 2x^2(y')^2[/tex]
Now divide by [itex]-2x^2y[/itex] to get
[tex]-\frac{2y^2+ 8xyy'+ 2x^2(y')^2}{2x^2y}[/tex]

Since the derivative will necessarily have "y" in it, I would see no reason to write y' as a function of x which I think is the "hard" part of what you did.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K