Hard-point Particle: Hamiltonian Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter dapias09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particle
dapias09
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

what do you understand by a hard-point gas?, I mean in terms of its hamiltonian.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me know if this is incorrect but I think what you are asking is, what is the form of the hamiltonian of a hard-sphere system?

If so, is there something in this definition that is troublesome? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_spheres
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you Jorriss, yes I realized that the hard-point gas is the same than the hard-sphere gas but in one dimension.
 
dapias09 said:
Thank you Jorriss, yes I realized that the hard-point gas is the same than the hard-sphere gas but in one dimension.
Sure, but I am unclear on what you are wondering about.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'

Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'

Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
View full post »

Thread 'Toponium Discovered'

Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
View full post »

Thread 'Dirac-Delta from Normalization of Continuous Eigenfunctions'

I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Particle distribution in the longitudinal beam dynamics in accelerator
Replies
2
Views
3K
B How hard have they banged on quarks, electrons, etc.?
Replies
17
Views
2K
I Particle exchange explaining attractive forces
Replies
12
Views
3K
B I wonder about a particle's energy when mass is obtained or lost
Replies
2
Views
3K
A What determines particle size in an atomizing spray nozzle?
Replies
3
Views
3K
I What would a hypothetical quark-quark collision yield?
Replies
4
Views
3K
I Understanding Spinor's Helicity
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Weak Interaction Hamiltonian V-A Structure Derivation
Replies
0
Views
528
A Why do the proton and electron have equal and opposite electric charge?
Replies
9
Views
3K
I Continuity of Hamiltonian at separatrix in action-angle variables
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top