Hope this helps!Solving Simultaneous Equations with Square Roots

AI Thread Summary
To solve the simultaneous equations involving square roots, first substitute new variables: let a = sqrt(x) and b = sqrt(y). This transforms the equations into a + b² = 11 and b + a² = 7. By adding these equations, you derive a new equation: a + a² + b + b² = 18. A method to find solutions includes guessing values for a and b that satisfy this equation, ultimately leading to the correct values of x = 9 and y = 4. This approach avoids the complexity of solving a fourth-degree polynomial.
benf.stokes
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Hi

How do you solve this equations analyticaly without solving a 4th degree polynomial
sqrt(x)+y=11; x+sqrt(y)=7

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'll give a general outline on how to solve this:

First of all, use new variables. a = sqrt(x) and b = sqrt(y). That will remove those ugly square roots for now.

Then, add the 2 equations and form a new equation a + a² + b + b² = 18. In this equation, 18 can be split up into 2 unknown values c and d to form 2 quadratic equations. Of these 2 values, you only need to know 1 to calculate the other, that is d = 18 - c. The roots of these 2 quadratic equations can be written in terms of these 2 values. Keeping in mind that the solutions can only be positive, that should lead you to the right answer
 
Last edited:
I may be misunderstanding but you seem to be saying that if you have a+ a^2+ b+ b^2= 18= c+ d then you must have a+ a^2= c and b+ b^2= d. That is not true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
I may be misunderstanding but you seem to be saying that is you have a+ a^2+ b+ b^2= 18= c+ d then you must have a+ a^2= c and b+ b^2= d. That is not true.

Do u want to explain why this is not true? If I define c as being a+a², and d as being b+b², then a + a² + b + b² = c + d = 18

Edit: nvm, you probably did misunderstand me^^
 
Kyouran said:
I'll give a general outline on how to solve this:

First of all, use new variables. a = sqrt(x) and b = sqrt(y). That will remove those ugly square roots for now.

Then, add the 2 equations and form a new equation a + a² + b + b² = 18. In this equation, 18 can be split up into 2 unknown values c and d to form 2 quadratic equations. Of these 2 values, you only need to know 1 to calculate the other, that is d = 18 - c. The roots of these 2 quadratic equations can be written in terms of these 2 values. Keeping in mind that the solutions can only be positive, that should lead you to the right answer

can you plees put full steps for this equation plees
 
Hello I'm 14 years old so i don't know what a 4th degree polynomial is... however i agree with the guy named Kyouran. This is how i did it:

sqrt(x) + y = 11 ...(1)
sqrt(y) + x = 7 ...(2)

Let sqrt(x) = a, and sqrt(y) = b.

The eqs will then be:
a + b^2 = 11 ...(3)
b + a^2 = 7 ...(4)

Add them together and you get:

a + a^2 + b + b^2 = 18

The way i solved it is just by doing guess and check. This only takes common sense:

I first tried a = 2 and b = 3 which when substituted into the equation equals 18:

2 + 2^2 + 3 + 3^2 = 18

However when subbing them into eqs 3 and 4, they weren't correct:

So i then switched the values around saying a = 3, and b = 2 which when subbed into eqs 3 and 4 were correct!

And so, as said before...

Since I let sqrt(x) = a, and the sqrt(y) = b:

sqrt (x) = 3
and so therefore x = 9

sqrt (y) = 2
and so therefore y = 4

therefore x = 9, y = 4 ;)

Now you will find, that when subbing these x and y values into your original eqs (1) and (2), they are sure to be correct!
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top