Has technology ruined the modern newspaper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Technology
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the impact of technology on modern newspapers, particularly focusing on the types of stories published and reader engagement. Participants explore the evolution of newspaper content and the shift towards digital media, examining both the aesthetic and practical implications of these changes.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant argues that technology has stripped newspapers of their character, citing the decline of sensational stories like 'bus plunge' incidents that used to fill newspaper space creatively.
  • Another participant expresses nostalgia for the absence of dramatic bus crash stories, indicating a personal interest in such narratives.
  • A different participant counters that traditional 'bus plunge' stories are still present in modern media, referencing a recent incident covered by a major news outlet.
  • One participant suggests that technology has not directly harmed newspapers but has led to a decrease in readership due to the availability of alternative news sources online.
  • Another participant questions the need for newspapers when similar information is accessible through television and radio, highlighting the convenience of multimedia news consumption.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether technology has negatively impacted newspapers. Some believe it has diminished the quality and character of content, while others argue that it has simply provided more options for consuming news. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall effects of technology on newspaper readership and content.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors influencing newspaper readership, such as personal preferences for content and the convenience of digital formats, but do not reach a consensus on the implications of these changes.

BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
364
Reaction score
87
Software allowing editors to completely lay out their newspapers have stripped newspapers of all of their character.

Case in point - when's the last time you read a 'bus plunge' story in the newspaper. Years ago, it seemed like you could count on reading a story of a bus load of people plunging into a ravine almost every week. Buses haven't gotten any safer in most of the world - in fact, a more open society in China means we should be able to read even more bus plunge stories - but you almost never see 'bus plunge' stories anymore.

We no longer get to read stories, such as:
Twelve persons were killed and ten were injured when a bus went off the highway and plunged into a 1,000 foot abyss about six miles from Anserma, Central Colombia today. The bus caught fire after landing in the abyss.

In the old days, when newspapers used the old mechanical type sets, they never knew exactly how the newspaper would look until the typesetters were finished laying out the newspapers. The bus plunge stories were great for filling awkward spaces in the newspaper since you could edit out as many extraneous details as necessary to make the story the right length. For example: the last sentence in the above story could easily be deleted without detracting from the story (although including it certainly adds to the aesthetic quality of the story).

Readers' fascination with these stories were a key reason for Hollywood's obsession with having all sorts of vehicles plunging off of mountain roads and bursting into flames in mid-air.

Readers here in Colorado Springs are certainly fascinated by the story when another tourist manages to circumvent the brake temperature check at Glen Cove on the road down Pikes Peak and is rewarded for his cleverness by having his brake fluid boil away. Pikes Peak is a big enough tourist attraction that there's always drivers coming up the mountain to provide an eye witness account of the reactions of the hapless driver trying to navigate the hairpin turns on the road down Pikes Peak before their car ultimately plunges off the side of the mountain, usually killing everyone inside (in one of the more fascinating incidents, the driver turned tried turning off the ignition, upping the challenge to navigating the hairpins with no brakes and and no power steering).

Now we have to be satisfied with perusing bus plunge stories on the web (Bus Plunge!) This is much less satisfying since, once again, the digital age eliminates the need for strategic editing. No more does the reader spend 10 minutes pondering why the bus plunged off the road, how the bus was spotted at the bottom of the ravine, how some of the passengers could have possibly survived a plunge into a 1,000 foot ravine, or what emotions were running through the passengers' eyes as they peered desperately out the windows of the plunging bus. All the details are provided with little need for thought or imagination by the reader. It's just not the same.:frown:
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
That's sad, I was wondering why I hadn't read about any good bus crashes lately. :wink:
 
Good news, BobG!

Bus Plunges, Killing 3 Alabama Students

ATLANTA, Ga., Nov. 20 — A school bus plunged nearly 40 feet off a highway overpass in Huntsville, Ala., on Monday and crashed nose-first into the ground, killing three students and sending 11 others to the intensive care unit, officials said.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/us/21bus.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

There's a photo of police officers yelling at the cameraperson taking the photo. It was actually the front-page image of the NYT for a while (online version), so technology is hardly sidelining the traditional 'bus plunge' story. :biggrin: (This thread is too morbid for me, I'm out of here. :rolleyes:)
 
I don't think technology has hurt the newspapers, directly that is.

Indirectly, people seem less likely to read newspapers, to choices given to readers have perhaps reduced the demand for newspapers.

I used to get the NY Times delievered, but when it became available on-line, I stopped getting the paper. I prefer receiving the news electronically - it saves collecting piles of newspaper - and most of the time I was throwing away about 1/3 - 1/2 of the paper, e.g. the Sports section got tossed - I never cared for it. Most of the society and arts pages got tossed. I preferred substantive news about national and international affairs and events, business and science & technology.

On Sunday, I probably threw out 2/3's of the paper without reading.

Then there is NPR and many other news sources on-line, in addition to the Times website. So technology has given us alternatives to the newspaper.
 
Why read a newspaper when I can get the same information on the TV and radio? (while driving to school or eating dinner)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K