Having trouble deciding my masters (and by extension, my future)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's dilemma in Sweden regarding the choice between pursuing a master's degree in electrical engineering or physics. The student has a background in electrical engineering and is considering two specific master's programs: "wireless, photonics and space-engineering," which offers better career prospects and higher salaries in the industry, and "physics and astronomy," which aligns more with personal interests but may lead to lower-paying academic positions. The student acknowledges the potential for a PhD in physics but is concerned about the stability and financial benefits of an engineering career. Participants in the discussion highlight that while engineering typically offers higher salaries, physics graduates can also earn competitive salaries, especially if they enter industry rather than academia. Ultimately, the student is grappling with the balance between career opportunities and personal passion.
Christofferk
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
Hey there, i guess i just need to ventilate some and see what people think about my situation and about the choices i have.

First of all i must say that i am from Sweden and therefore i have conditions that few other people have. I get my education for free and i am free to chose whatever field i'd like to. Unlike some of my friends from earlier days in my life, i have actually taken this opportunity and have studied electrical engineering for quite some time now and just today i was given a bachelor thesis project to do (at my uni we apply for some projects available (you can suggest your own projects as well) and then you're given one depending on your previous academic results, i.e. you compete with other students for the spots at the project you want in on).

The problem i have is chosing the masters programme which i would attend, the type of programme i am enrolled in makes you take a bachelor AND a masters, you need both to graduate. I am torn between a future as an engineer or one as a physicist.

I am leaning towards either a masters programme called "wireless, photonics and space-engineering", which is basically like antennas and signals and stuff, and the other programme is one called "physics and astronomy" where you either specialize in theoretical, experimental or astrophysics.

The first one would give me more opportunities to work out in the industry as an engineer and make some sick money but the other one i think would be way more fun but i'd not have as many career-opportunities (getting a phd after would be the next step, naturual continuation of the masters) and i guess i'd not get the same pay i would get as an engineer.

I'm basically torn and i don't know what to do. Thoughts?

P.S (and yes, on my e.engineering programme we take a lot of physics and i have taken extra courses in physics, such as quantum mechanics etc etc to be better prepared for the physics-master if i end up choosing it)

P.P.S (and yes, i also get that you guys here may be biased)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The real question seems to be what do YOU value more. The career opportunities of electrical engineering, or your passion for physics? Only you can answer this for yourself.
 
TJGilb said:
The real question seems to be what do YOU value more. The career opportunities of electrical engineering, or your passion for physics? Only you can answer this for yourself.
It's so haaard :( I mean, with the engineering-masters i'll have a way higher salary and the stability a full time employment provides, but the physics one seems more fun :(
 
Christofferk said:
It's so haaard :( I mean, with the engineering-masters i'll have a way higher salary and the stability a full time employment provides, but the physics one seems more fun :(

What information are you basing this conclusion on? All the data I've seen seems to indicate that on average, physics graduates earn salaries that aren't all that different from engineering graduates when they get into the workplace.
 
Choppy said:
What information are you basing this conclusion on? All the data I've seen seems to indicate that on average, physics graduates earn salaries that aren't all that different from engineering graduates when they get into the workplace.
Maybe i should also say that i am choosing between engineering degree in the industry, or taking the physics one and staying in academia, then the salary is lower.
 
Choppy said:
salaries that aren't all that different from engineering graduates when they get into the workplace.

I think that depends on whether you go into industry or academia. Industry will probably almost always be more lucrative.
 
  • Like
Likes Christofferk
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top