Having trouble understand the Mass-to-Charge Ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carlos508
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the mass-to-charge ratio and how to conceptually divide charge by mass. It clarifies that while charge is either positive or negative, dividing charge by mass is about determining a ratio rather than performing a direct division of two different types of quantities. The analogy of dividing different units, like miles by hours, is used to illustrate that such divisions can yield meaningful results in specific contexts. The participant expresses newfound clarity on the concept after this explanation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding ratios in physics.
Carlos508
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding how you would divide the charge of an object by its mass. How can you divide a charge - I mean isn't it either positive or negative? I understand that the charge is equal to the 6.25 × 1018 so an electron would have a charge of −1.602 x 10-19.

I guess my question is, how can you divide a charge by mass - isn't that like dividing apples and oranges? I understand that mass and energy are related, but I don't understand how you can divide a charge with a mass.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Carlos508 said:
I guess my question is, how can you divide a charge by mass - isn't that like dividing apples and oranges? I understand that mass and energy are related, but I don't understand how you can divide a charge with a mass.

Hi Carlos508! Welcome to PF! :smile:

In maths, you can divide anything by anything else, so long as you make it clear that the result is in "quotient units" …

for example, you can divide miles by hours, to get mph …

you can even divide money by minutes, to work out how fast you're spending …

and you can divide apples by oranges, so long as you make it clear that the result is not a dimensionless number, but is a number with dimensions apple.orange-1. :biggrin:
 
Ah, of course. I can't believe I overlooked that, it makes sense to me now...so when you're dividing the charge by the mass, you're not necessarily trying to divide one into another (?), but determining the ratio between the two. Got it!

Thanks for your help, and the welcoming :)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top