I Hawking Radiation Extrapolation: A Conjecture

Mike Holland
Messages
114
Reaction score
1
The intense gravity near the event horizon causes complementary particles to pop into existence spontaneously. As local space-time is continuous through the EV, the same would be happening just inside the EV, only more so as the gravity field and gradient is greater. So near the singularity particles would be appearing at a very high rate, and there would be a fuzz of particles appearing and then disappearing down the plug hole. All these particles would borrow a little of the singularity mass, so at any one time a proportion of the mass would be in these particles and not in the singularity. Perhaps there is no singularity, and just a fuzz of particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mike Holland said:
Perhaps there is no singularity, and just a fuzz of particles
Perhaps. But we currently have no theory about it, so we will have to wait a considerable time to discuss it here.
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777 and topsquark

Thread 'I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed'

OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
View full post »

Thread 'Synchronizing clocks in an inertial frame if light is anisotropic'

ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
View full post »

Thread 'Is the variation of the metric ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## a tensor?'

From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Hawking Radiation: Can Particles Appear with Relativistic Velocities?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Question about the Entropy of a Black Hole Singularity
Replies
17
Views
3K
I How Does Hawking Radiation Lead to Black Hole Evaporation?
Replies
8
Views
2K
A Negative energy in Hawking radiation
Replies
1
Views
1K
A Hawking Radiation Inside a Black Hole: Theory & Possibilities
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Hawking Radiation: Info vs Semanticity? - Hossenfelder
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Validity of theoretical arguments for Unruh and Hawking radiation
3
Replies
146
Views
11K
B The Singularity and Hawking radiation
Replies
7
Views
2K
I I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed
2
Replies
73
Views
537
I Negative Mass and Hawking Radiation
Replies
6
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top