Head Fall Acceleration Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the deceleration experienced by a child's head when falling from a height of 0.40 m onto different surfaces, hardwood and carpet. It highlights that traumatic brain injuries, such as concussions, occur with accelerations above 1,000 m/s^2, while accelerations below 800 m/s^2 are generally safe. The stopping distances for the two surfaces are noted, with hardwood resulting in a 2.0 mm stop and carpet a 1.0 cm stop. The original poster expresses frustration with the problem but is eager to learn the method for solving it. The conversation reflects a recurring interest in mechanical problems related to traumatic injuries in children.
diesel828
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm not particularly looking for the answers in this problem as much as I am looking for the method to the solution. It's been giving me a headache.

1. Traumatic brain injury such as concussion results when the head undergoes a very large acceleration. Generally, an acceleration less than 800 m/s^2 lasting for any length of time will not cause injury, whereas an acceleration greater than 1,000 m/s^2 lasting for at least 1 ms will cause injury. Suppose a small child rolls off a bed that is 0.40 m above the floor. If the floor is hardwood, the child's head is brought to rest in approsimately 2.0mm. If the floor is carpeted, this stopping distance is increased to about 1.0 cm. Calculate the magnitude and the duration of the deceleration in both cases to determine risk of injury.

Thanks for any advice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One is suppose to show ones efforts before asking for help...:smile:
 
Oh. Well, I took my best stab at it and turned it in. I'm going to wait and see how I did. The problem really gave me a headache for some reason. Similar questions weren't so bad. Maybe it was the image of a baby falling off a bed? I don't know.
I'll post my results.
 
Traumatic injuries? Small children rolling off their beds? This is the third or fourth time someone posts such interesting mechanical problems. :confused:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top